Hardy Pyle Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 I'd easily take RJ. We'd be better than 3-6 that's for sure.
Pete Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 I would definately take RJ. That being said I am not sure RJ would of lasted 9 games. Drew sucks, hes pathetic, hes a choker but the big lug is durable
JimBob2232 Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 Interesting: Rob Johnson (Bills Career): 60.4% completion rating Drew Bledsoe (Bills Career): 59.3% completion rating Sacks per start: Rob Johnson: 4.2 Drew Bledsoe: 3.1 TD/Int Ratio Rob Johnson 1.4:1 Drew Bledsoe: 1.2:1 I dont know how to combine QB Ratings, but in the 3 years drew is here 2002: 86.0 (16 games) 2003: 73.0 (16 games) 2004: 70.3 (9 games) RJ: 1998: 102.9 (8 games) 1999: 119.5 (2 games) 2000: 82.2 (11 games) 2001: 76.3 (8 games) Wow...ya know...as much as I am shocked by this...I think I would have to say I woudl rather have RJ.... Amazing stuff
Rico Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 RJ all the way... Been a Bills fan since OJ's rookie year, & no one player has come close to disgusting me more than Bledsoe. :I starred in Brokeback Mountain: Drew
Alaska Darin Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 I'd rather spend an August afternoon in the Death Valley desert with BF, Ice, Blzrul, Tennyboy, and a keg of Jolt Cola than choose a side in this debate.
Corp000085 Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 Rob! At least he didnt wear concrete shoes. no, but he did wear loafers. Its a toss up for me. In one hand, you have extremely durable bledsoe who is a class guy, immobile, not accurate, can't read a defense. Then you have RJ. A jerkoff, runs for his life, can't read a defense, not accurate, would lay down his life for the bills... Out of stupidity, or out of the freebee paycheck he received. For as much as i hate RJ, whenever i think of him, i think of the way he played the titans in those 2 games, or that game winning TD he ran for against the chiefs. I have nothing to hang my hat on with bledsoe. In a toughie, i take RJ. But only cause jim kelly is unwilling to unretire, or at least become a coach.
gflande1 Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 Johnson, atleast he knew when to get injured!!!!!
Guest cal t Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 Johnson, atleast he knew when to get injured!!!!! 119356[/snapback] What a pathetic group!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--RJ was even more horrible than Drew.....--welllll....maybe not...whichever one I last see playing is the most awful...
KOKBILLS Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 Johnson, atleast he knew when to get injured!!!!! 119356[/snapback]
ubhockey Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 I'd rather bleed myself to death than watch one game with either of those two guys leading my team. I'm so depressed. I hate to say this, but I think it will be 4-5 years before we turn anything around. This team has developed a losing mentality and that's not easy to shake off.
Lori Posted November 16, 2004 Posted November 16, 2004 I'd rather spend an August afternoon in the Death Valley desert with BF, Ice, Blzrul, Tennyboy, and a keg of Jolt Cola than choose a side in this debate. 119275[/snapback] Now there's a frightening visual.
Recommended Posts