FIVE Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 So are we excited for TE to return. Do we stick with Fitz. Honestly I am right in the middle on this one. We must remember TE's last performance was a 6 - 3 loss to Cleveland in the B - Lo.
Doc Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 Trent is done. If Fitz goes south, go with Hamdan.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 I'm not sure Fitz did anything today that Trent doesn't do, except for the first pass of the game (i.e., the ball to TO in the middle of the field, which he dropped). If Fitz can work the middle of the field and throw the ball even in the vicinity of our receivers, I'd start him over TE.
rpcolosi Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 So are we excited for TE to return. Do we stick with Fitz. Honestly I am right in the middle on this one. We must remember TE's last performance was a 6 - 3 loss to Cleveland in the B - Lo. we must remember he wasn't aided by this many turnovers. we have put up 20 pts with 4 turnovers and 16 points with 6 turnovers.... our offense has been WORSE under fitzpatrick... ahhh!
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 They're both atrocious. Time for Hamden or somebody else
Alphadawg7 Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 we must remember he wasn't aided by this many turnovers. we have put up 20 pts with 4 turnovers and 16 points with 6 turnovers.... our offense has been WORSE under fitzpatrick... ahhh! LMAO at your claim... You do realize that two of our measly 8 TD's while Trent was QB were from Moormans fake and Schobels INT return right? You also realize that under Trent we had one offensive TD since week 2 right and none in our last 12 qtrs of play before Fitz hit Evans in the Jets game... You also realize we had no offensive TD's in a game where we held the opposing QB to TWO completions right under Trent...and that it was a terrible D to boot...
FloridaSnow Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 I think we stick with Fitz for right now. It's nice to not see check downs on almost every play. Fitz has less skill than TE, but he seems to make quicker reads and has more willingness to actually throw the ball to different parts of the field.
DC Tom Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Time for Hamden or somebody else Who would be just as atrocious.
stevestojan Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Two QBs who no other team would consider a starting QB and yet we have a QB controversy. My vote is for Fitz.
stevestojan Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 oh crap.... sorry mods http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?showtopic=99652
Simon Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 The only controversy here is whether or not it even matters who's playing QB. I don't think it does. Although I'd really like to see Hamdan get a fair shake.
kenny3000 Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 I'm not sure Fitz did anything today that Trent doesn't do, except for the first pass of the game (i.e., the ball to TO in the middle of the field, which he dropped). If Fitz can work the middle of the field and throw the ball even in the vicinity of our receivers, I'd start him over TE. Um...challenge. Did you watch any of the games this season? Fitz at least throws to his wide receivers. Granted some of those throws early didn't look very good, but at least he doesn't check down...every...single....time. Trent does not throw long passes to his receivers or give them a chance to get open, at the first sign of anything he checks down.
thebug Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 LMAO at your claim... You do realize that two of our measly 8 TD's while Trent was QB were from Moormans fake and Schobels INT return right? You also realize that under Trent we had one offensive TD since week 2 right and none in our last 12 qtrs of play before Fitz hit Evans in the Jets game... You also realize we had no offensive TD's in a game where we held the opposing QB to TWO completions right under Trent...and that it was a terrible D to boot... Fitz is no better.
Alphadawg7 Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Fitz is no better. Our touchdown production clearly says otherwise... For the record I dont think he is very good...that being said, he is still a better option than Trent, just ask Lee Evans...
thebug Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Our touchdown production clearly says otherwise... For the record I dont think he is very good...that being said, he is still a better option than Trent, just ask Lee Evans... I'm pretty sure we had 39 yards of total offense in the first half?
DanInUticaTampa Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 I think this shows that we still very much need a QB and new coaches and a DT and an LB Some depth for them too an LT and an oline that doesn't get penalties.
Recommended Posts