Corp000085 Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 Sad and pathetic. She was really cute back in the day. Now, she looks like one of those pictures from that faces of meth site.
Pete Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 She used to be so beautiful! Her curves were gorgeous. It is so sad
WellDressed Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 and we care because?????? I love Gweneth Paltrow.
DC Tom Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 Sad and pathetic. She was really cute back in the day. Now, she looks like one of those pictures from that faces of meth site. Talented, too. She really was a pretty good actress.
WellDressed Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 Talented, too. She really was a pretty good actress. Oh shucks, I forgot about that masterpiece "i know who killed me"
stevestojan Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 Talented, too. She really was a pretty good actress.
ofiba Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 Haven't you ever seen The Parent Trap? She plays two different characters in that movie.
Simon Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 A smiling glamour shot of her slathered in make-up with a $500 hairdo in a lowcut dress with a push-up bra. VS. A candid photo of her with no makeup, pissed off, with her hair pulled back wearing an ugly suit. Can't imagine why she doesn't look as attractive.
Captain Hindsight Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 A smiling glamour shot of her slathered in make-up with a $500 hairdo in a lowcut dress with a push-up bra. VS. A candid photo of her with no makeup, pissed off, with her hair pulled back wearing an ugly suit. Can't imagine why she doesn't look as attractive. I think the point of the post how far she has fallen
KD in CA Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 I think the point of the post how far she has fallen And I think the point of his post is that that perception of how fall she's fallen is much great than the reality. If they really wanted to, they could probably make her look pretty close to the 2004 version with the right clothes, make-up, hair and lighting.
Simon Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 And I think the point of his post is that that perception of how fall she's fallen is much great than the reality. If they really wanted to, they could probably make her look pretty close to the 2004 version with the right clothes, make-up, hair and lighting. Which wouldn't even be all that tough since she really didn't look all that great before. And thank you for getting it.
thebug Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Which wouldn't even be all that tough since she really didn't look all that great before.And thank you for getting it. Says the guy with his finger up has ass.
inkman Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Thought she was excellent in Mean Girls too. Why, yes, yes she was.
GG Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 There's got to be a Keith Richards joke in there somewhere.
DC Tom Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Watch Georgia Rule. I used to think she was a no-talent hack until I saw that; her performance in that movie was very, very good. Also make sure you watch it with a woman...because if you're going to watch that movie, you may as well leverage the whole "sensitive guy watching chick flick" thing into getting laid.
John Adams Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Also make sure you watch it with a woman...because if you're going to watch that movie, you may as well leverage the whole "sensitive guy watching chick flick" thing into getting laid. Do you think women say to one another, "Watch Transformers with him and you'll be sure to get laid."
Recommended Posts