dave mcbride Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 It has to be irrefutable. To me, it looked less like a bobble than a clean shift to his left hand. In any case, it really has to be clear. That was not.
Simon Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 It has to be irrefutable. To me, it looked less like a bobble than a clean shift to his left hand. In any case, it really has to be clear. That was not. That call is not made in Rich Stadium.
Maguire's Beer Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 That call is not made in Rich Stadium. The Bills don't lose often in Rich Stadium. Alas, we now play in Ralph Wilson Stadium, a cursed field. In all seriousness, it was a bad call.
Simon Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 The Bills don't lose often in Rich Stadium. Alas, we now play in Ralph Wilson Stadium, a cursed field. In all seriousness, it was a bad call. I've never heard of Ralph Wilson stadium.
CodeMonkey Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 He was juggling the ball, the overturn was the correct call. Nice toss by Fitz though.
GOBILLS78 Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 The call was fine. He bobbled the ball. Also, who will the sports world fellate now that Sanchez and his holier-than-thou coach have faceplanted?
Poeticlaw Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 It has to be irrefutable. To me, it looked less like a bobble than a clean shift to his left hand. In any case, it really has to be clear. That was not. Sorry I think you are being biased he clearly bobbled the ball before completing the catch out of bounds the Refs actually got one right.
lets_go_bills Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 It has to be irrefutable. To me, it looked less like a bobble than a clean shift to his left hand. In any case, it really has to be clear. That was not. I'm with ya 100% There has to be irrefutable evidence to overturn a call. That was not a bobble and there certainly was not enough to overturn that one. BS call.
Bufcomments Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 The Ball moved you could see it. They won I'm still tripping over that
CodeMonkey Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 Also, who will the sports world fellate now that Sanchez and his holier-than-thou coach have faceplanted? Tom Terriffic after the ass kicking they gave to Tenn.
loyal2dagame Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 I'm with ya 100% There has to be irrefutable evidence to overturn a call. That was not a bobble and there certainly was not enough to overturn that one. BS call. it was enough of a non bobble to have the ball start to slide up his chest. overturning the call was right
Offside Number 76 Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 There are a ton of WRs that get that call every week; it was a catch, no question. Tell me that Welker or Wayne would have had that one called back. No. Glad to not have to B word about it affecting the outcome.
GOBILLS78 Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 Tom Terriffic after the ass kicking they gave to Tenn. Ah, yes. How could I forget?
Peter Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 That was a bad reversal. I thought it was a catch. It looked like he perhaps purposely let go of the ball with his right hand so that he could brace himself with his right hand while holding the ball with his left hand. If they called it the other way to begin with, I could understand replay not overturning the original call -- but I do not understand how there was enough evidence to overturn the original call here.
SUNTANBILLSFAN2 Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 I'm with ya 100% There has to be irrefutable evidence to overturn a call. That was not a bobble and there certainly was not enough to overturn that one. BS call. how about the fact lee was interfered with too no call
thebug Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 Are you kidding.....that was not a catch, by the time he caught the ball he didn't have any feet in.
Offside Number 76 Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 That was a bad reversal. I thought it was a catch. It looked like he perhaps purposely let go of the ball with his right hand so that he could brace himself with his right hand while holding the ball with his left hand. If they called it the other way to begin with, I could understand replay not overturning the original call -- but I do not understand how there was enough evidence to overturn the original call here. There wasn't; the Bills got jobbed and overcame it. Happened all the time in our favor, about 18 years ago.
bladiebla Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 As soon as you start to have to magnify the image in order to get something from it, it's no longer irrefutable. Case of where they are taking technology too far and it ruins the game. IMHO do away with the whole possesion rule; either you have it or not and if you didnt have it and loose the ball its a fumble.
Recommended Posts