Rayzer32 Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 First, Tom Brady is obviously immune to getting a intentional grounding call against him. I've seen him chuck the ball away more than once so he does not get hit. Now the refs call a roughing the kicker, when it should have been running into the kicker when the Pats were kicking from their own endzone. The NFL is getting worse week by week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloWings Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 First, Tom Brady is obviously immune to getting a intentional grounding call against him. I've seen him chuck the ball away more than once so he does not get hit. Now the refs call a roughing the kicker, when it should have been running into the kicker when the Pats were kicking from their own endzone. The NFL is getting worse week by week. Denver's helping them along, too. They just jumped off side on the next punt attempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayzer32 Posted October 11, 2009 Author Share Posted October 11, 2009 Gee how bout that. The Pats were punting on 4th and 4 but the Broncos got called for a neutral zone infraction. This time the reason was the defender moving is what forced the Patriot player to move. That does not get called everyday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayzer32 Posted October 11, 2009 Author Share Posted October 11, 2009 Denver's helping them along, too. They just jumped off side on the next punt attempt. We must have been posting at the same time. Did you see the Patriot move? That was an iffy call as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshsin Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 I hate the pats but both 4 down calls were right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayzer32 Posted October 11, 2009 Author Share Posted October 11, 2009 I hate the pats but both 4 down calls were right They were both iffy that could have gone either way if it were any other team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly McButterpants Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Denver's helping them along, too. They just jumped off side on the next punt attempt. Nah, 30 on the Pat*s jumped, but as usual the call favors Belicheat . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWVaBeach Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 First, Tom Brady is obviously immune to getting a intentional grounding call against him. I've seen him chuck the ball away more than once so he does not get hit. Now the refs call a roughing the kicker, when it should have been running into the kicker when the Pats were kicking from their own endzone. The NFL is getting worse week by week. It wasn't roughing it was running into and got them 5 yds when they only needed 4. But still...*Pats suck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Nah, 30 on the Pat*s jumped, but as usual the call favors Belicheat . . . Just come to grips and admit the Bills suck and quit analyzing every call for the pats as proof of a conspiracy. Did Belicheat hold the Bills to 3 points today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Wow I amazed I figured for sure it would have been rules Bradys hand was going forward or that the Broncos fumbled. Maybe these refs didnt get the memos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Wow I amazed I figured for sure it would have been rules Bradys hand was going forward or that the Broncos fumbled. Maybe these refs didnt get the memos No remarks about the Bronco non fumble? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 No remarks about the Bronco non fumble. Or the 'taunting' call on the Bronco TD drive where the ref threw the flag before the taunt occurred. This is a really good game. Refreshing to watch professional football after the JV performance we saw earlier today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Or the 'taunting' call on the Bronco TD drive where the ref threw the flag before the taunt occurred. This is a really good game. Refreshing to watch professional football after the JV performance we saw earlier today. I always am amazed by any any game I watch after the Bills. Complete pass? No penalty? It can't be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 I always am amazed by any any game I watch after the Bills. Complete pass? No penalty? It can't be right. I'm starting to realize that I don't need to watch the Bills to enjoy football. I can watch a game like this, between two teams that are not only competent, but actually accomplished at the sport. I enjoy the game, root against the Pats* or Cowboys or whoever and about half the time it has a happy ending. Compare that to Bills 'football': 3 hours of horrible incompetence capped with a brainless mistake that gives away any chance of a win almost every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 Their RDE was lining up offsides on every play. Couldn't believe they finally called it at the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayzer32 Posted October 12, 2009 Author Share Posted October 12, 2009 Or the 'taunting' call on the Bronco TD drive where the ref threw the flag before the taunt occurred. This is a really good game. Refreshing to watch professional football after the JV performance we saw earlier today. That ref was throwing the flag for interference. The flag for taunting came from a different ref. Simms explained it after the commercial break. There were two flags on that play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 That ref was throwing the flag for interference. The flag for taunting came from the ref in the middle of the field. There were two flags on that play. Seriously, some of my NE friends were whining about this. Yah, I'm sure the ref made up his mind to throw a phantom taunting call when the ball was in mid-air and he (the ref) just happened to luck out by the fact that the NE player did eventually taunt after the flag. Mouth-breathers in this country with a college education are amazing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts