Chef Jim Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 13,000 jobs lost. Glad we gave GM all that money.
Gene Frenkle Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 13,000 jobs lost. Glad we gave GM all that money. I must need to be a subscriber to get the full article and read about how this is Obama's fault.
pBills Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 I must need to be a subscriber to get the full article and read about how this is Obama's fault. Everything is Obama's fault
Chef Jim Posted October 1, 2009 Author Posted October 1, 2009 I must need to be a subscriber to get the full article and read about how this is Obama's fault. Where did I say it was his fault? You're getting paranoid there Gene. I'm just pointing out that the administration throws out there the "we've saved x number of jobs" which of course is unprovable but their attempt at saving jobs didn't work here. There were 13,000 jobs lost. So I guess their response is going to be "sure there were 13,000 lost, but if we had not acted there would have been 130,000 jobs lost so it's a net savings of 117,000." See that's how they calculate that number of saved jobs and there is no way to prove it.
Gene Frenkle Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Everything is Obama's fault I just wish he would enact a Socialist policy that says that all WSJ articles belong to the people instead of this "privileged subscriber" crap.
Gene Frenkle Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Where did I say it was his fault? You're getting paranoid there Gene. I'm just pointing out that the administration throws out there the "we've saved x number of jobs" which of course is unprovable but their attempt at saving jobs didn't work here. There were 13,000 jobs lost. So I guess their response is going to be "sure there were 13,000 lost, but if we had not acted there would have been 130,000 jobs lost so it's a net savings of 117,000." See that's how they calculate that number of saved jobs and there is no way to prove it. Ok, take it easy dude. Imagine - propaganda and politics from politicians!
Magox Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 I know what BO should do, he should create a Job Loss Czar, 13,000 of them. You don't need to have good credentials, background tests aren't necessary, and if you are a conspiracy theorist you'll fit right in, heck you don't even need to agree with capitalism, you can support communism, it doesn't matter. Problem solved
pBills Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 I know what BO should do, he should create a Job Loss Czar, 13,000 of them. You don't need to have good credentials, background tests aren't necessary, and if you are a conspiracy theorist you'll fit right in, heck you don't even need to agree with capitalism, you can support communism, it doesn't matter. Problem solved Or you can be like those in the other party and just make blanket statements not actually try to find a solution to the problem. After all, election year coming up soon. Better to not have your name on anything at this point.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Or you can be like those in the other party and just make blanket statements not actually try to find a solution to the problem. After all, election year coming up soon. Better to not have your name on anything at this point. Worked for the Democrats in '06, after all.
DC Tom Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 I know what BO should do, he should create a Job Loss Czar, 13,000 of them. You don't need to have good credentials, background tests aren't necessary, and if you are a conspiracy theorist you'll fit right in, heck you don't even need to agree with capitalism, you can support communism, it doesn't matter. Problem solved 13000 Czars? You'd need a Czar Czar just to oversee them.
pBills Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Worked for the Democrats in '06, after all. Republican party should it down pat, nothing done in almost 8-9 years.
Magox Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 13000 Czars? You'd need a Czar Czar just to oversee them. Sounds logical
DC Tom Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Sounds logical Well, then...if the 13000 Czars have someone with authority over them, are they really Czars?
Magox Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Well, then...if the 13000 Czars have someone with authority over them, are they really Czars? Maybe this Czar thing needs to be reconsidered
DC Tom Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Maybe this Czar thing needs to be reconsidered Maybe they just need a different title. Call the Czardines. ba-dum-bum <rimshot> Thank you, I'm here all day, try the veal.
Chef Jim Posted October 1, 2009 Author Posted October 1, 2009 Ok, take it easy dude. Imagine - propaganda and politics from politicians! I see, you got nuthin'. I understand.
Gene Frenkle Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 I see, you got nuthin'. I understand. I like you Betty.
Magox Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Maybe they just need a different title. Call the Czardines. ba-dum-bum <rimshot> Thank you, I'm here all day, try the veal.
Chef Jim Posted October 1, 2009 Author Posted October 1, 2009 Thirty years I've been sitting on that joke... That's one smelly czardine.
Recommended Posts