RyanC882 Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Saw this on CNNSI.com http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/...ick?eref=fromSI Vick in Buffalo? He can throw the deep ball, and could utilize Evans and TO much better than Edwards.
McBeane Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Saw this on CNNSI.com http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/...ick?eref=fromSI Vick in Buffalo? He can throw the deep ball, and could utilize Evans and TO much better than Edwards. By far one of the dumbest threads I have seen. That is pure speculation and has no base to it.
billsfreak Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Saw this on CNNSI.com http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/...ick?eref=fromSI Vick in Buffalo? He can throw the deep ball, and could utilize Evans and TO much better than Edwards. If you are looking for someone to throw an accurate long ball, Vick is the last person you want.
SteamRoller67 Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Yeah, OK. I want to replace a guy who throws to RB's and tight ends all day with a guy who is faster, has a stronger arm, but throws to RB's and tight ends all day.
Clippers of Nfl Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 I'd take Vick in a heartbeat. +1 the more offensive firepower, the better.
SteamRoller67 Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 I'd take Vick in a heartbeat. For punt returns and kickoffs...me too. QB, never!
DC Tom Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 +1 the more offensive firepower, the better. Yeah, because usually the best solution to not utilizing the firepower you have is to add even more.
blzrul Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Saw this on CNNSI.com http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/...ick?eref=fromSI Vick in Buffalo? He can throw the deep ball, and could utilize Evans and TO much better than Edwards.
stuckincincy Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Yeah, because usually the best solution to not utilizing the firepower you have is to add even more. He just might be that 3rd option checkdown receiver with the YAC moves to get that 1st down.
Cash Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 If you are looking for someone to throw an accurate long ball, Vick is the last person you want. Vick's accuracy on the longball was fine. It was short and intermediate routes where he was woefully inaccurate.
Canadian Bills Fan Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 You all seem to forget the benifit of having a mobile QB. The last time the Bills made the playoffs we had a mobile QB. Plus, he can make plays and scramble for first downs and would draw coverage off of other players. Hate him all you want but you cant deny that he is a playmake which is something we are missing in Trent.
McBeane Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 I would be willing to bet that they would trade Kolb before they traded Vick.
Alphadawg7 Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Saw this on CNNSI.com http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/...ick?eref=fromSI Vick in Buffalo? He can throw the deep ball, and could utilize Evans and TO much better than Edwards. This isnt a rumor and Vick is not on the trading block...why post it? Its just someone speculating on whether the Eagles should put Vick on trading block given the number of QB's they have and the number of QB needy teams...
rstencel Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Please no. The guy cant read defense and runs at first hint of pressure. With our tackles hurt we wouldn't need wide-outs at all with him a QB. Plus wouldn't want a crime boss on any team I am rooting for. For the person stating how well he did as a starter, he was never an accurate passer, but kept defenses off balance with his athlectisism. He never was good at reading defenses, but the defense having to use a spy for him, helped simplify the reads for him. He hasn't played for over 2 years, and will take awhile to relearn how to read defenses. He isn't as fast or athletic as he was, so some of that advantage has been taken away as well. His main target was one of the best receiving tight ends in the game at the time, and he relied on that short save throw to get him going. Bills don't have that TE dependability yet, although have one with potential. Even if he wasn't a crook and scoundrel, don't think he is a good fit, and think TE is a much better QB than he is at this point.
bbillsfan87 Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 this is like groundhog's day or something....
Stenbar Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Saw this on CNNSI.com http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/...ick?eref=fromSI Vick in Buffalo? He can throw the deep ball, and could utilize Evans and TO much better than Edwards. Id rather have Kolb..
buffaloboyinATL Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 This would be like the golfer who keeps buying new drivers but never takes a lesson. He's just gonna suck with a different driver.
rackemrack Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 I would be willing to bet that they would trade Kolb before they traded Vick. if Kolb was on the block, I would hope the bills made them an offer... I wouldn't waste my time with Vick
Recommended Posts