keepthefaith Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 AP story I wonder if Rep. Michelle Bachmann is proud? PTR So Michelle Bachmann would be a villain for wanting the census to be administered accurately?
DC Tom Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 I hate when you idiots think you've won something. Because the problem is that you are still idiots. Whether you are right or wrong, that fact has not changed. Highly ironic coming from someone who's never been seen to string together three consecutive, coherent thoughts.
IDBillzFan Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Highly ironic coming from someone who's never been seen to string together three consecutive, coherent thoughts. But I'm sure he takes comfort in knowing that, at the end of the day, he has Bill Nye on his side.
Magox Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Dems are trying to do just that.http://thehill.com//homenews/house/69295-d...-150b-stock-tax poor little conner, always 5,674,953 steps behind http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?showtopic=102147
Alaska Darin Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Look who the asshat is ^ Well, maybe the guy who hung himself was a racist, ignorant redneck.
Alaska Darin Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Dems are trying to do just that.http://thehill.com//homenews/house/69295-d...-150b-stock-tax Whoa, that's a really good idea. Not surprised someone like you is lauding it. But everyone else is an idiot.
Adam Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 But as a liberal, he's probably got extra feathers in his cap. So, again as a liberal, he's just fulfilling the liberal goal of redistribution of feathers. Not like those robber-barons on Wall Street who hoard feathers and keep half the country feather-poor. You know what this country needs? A "Let Wall Street Pay For The Restoration Of Main Street's Hat Feathers Act," to bring us more in line with Scandanavian feather equality. Maybe if the term redistribution was repackaged as trickle down, you'd get that warm fuzzy feeling.
Magox Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Maybe if the term redistribution was repackaged as trickle down, you'd get that warm fuzzy feeling. Only fools and sheeple believe that "trickle down" economics don't work.
IDBillzFan Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Maybe if the term redistribution was repackaged as trickle down, you'd get that warm fuzzy feeling. Because taking from people who earn more than $200K/year specifically to fund entitlement programs for the unproductive lazyasses of the world while simultaneously robbing the people of their freedoms is precisely the same thing as a profitable company expanding it's operations by hiring more people to something other than yet another government job.
Gene Frenkle Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 I'd be willing to bet that the people in the region don't need a condescending rush-to-judgement look-down-your-nose liberal snot like yourself awarding them 'feathers in their collective cap' if for no other reason that it is very likely beneath them. Let he who is without condescension cast the first stone.
Gene Frenkle Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Gene don't like red states. Very true.
Gene Frenkle Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Well, maybe the guy who hung himself was a racist, ignorant redneck. You and Tom share a brain. I'll say that it was funny the first time at least.
Chef Jim Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Dems are trying to do just that.http://thehill.com//homenews/house/69295-d...-150b-stock-tax I thought they didn't want to tax "poor" people?
Gene Frenkle Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Is it possible you might reconsider jumping to conclusions based on race and geographical location the next time? I'll try. One thing I've learned around here is that humans have a hard time getting past their preconceived notions and prejudices. I always try to stay away from this aspect of my human nature, but I'm not always successful. I can at least admit when I'm wrong, which is better than most from what I've seen. I'm always willing to change my mind given new evidence. I'm a flip-flopper like that. So in answer to your question - yes (and no).
GG Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 I'll try. One thing I've learned around here is that humans have a hard time getting past their preconceived notions and prejudices. I always try to stay away from this aspect of my human nature, but I'm not always successful. I can at least admit when I'm wrong, which is better than most from what I've seen. I'm always willing to change my mind given new evidence. I'm a flip-flopper like that. So in answer to your question - yes (and no). Yet you have no problem in blindly supporting a party that doesn't believe in what you just wrote? Has anyone called you a hypocrite today yet?
Gene Frenkle Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 Yet you have no problem in blindly supporting a party that doesn't believe in what you just wrote? Has anyone called you a hypocrite today yet? Which party are you referring to? Seems that could apply to all of them. Most people don't believe in what I just wrote beacuse I'm identifying an aspect of human nature. I agree that I tend to lean to the left, but I think for myself more than most IMO.
Alaska Darin Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 You and Tom share a brain. I'll say that it was funny the first time at least. I'd have had to read the rest of the thread to know someone else had pointed out another example of your consistent retardia. You'll just have to forgive me.
Gene Frenkle Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 I'd have had to read the rest of the thread to know someone else had pointed out another example of your consistent retardia. You'll just have to forgive me. You obviously have more important things to do than troll the message boards all day...
DC Tom Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 You and Tom share a brain. I'll say that it was funny the first time at least. I think it's more an appreciation of Pythonesque absurdism that we share. And absurdism is often rooted in bad assumptions, of which there were a shitload bandied about on this topic.
Gene Frenkle Posted November 25, 2009 Posted November 25, 2009 I think it's more an appreciation of Pythonesque absurdism that we share. And absurdism is often rooted in bad assumptions, of which there were a shitload bandied about on this topic. Can Vladimir Putin see your shared brain from Eastern Siberia?
Recommended Posts