tennesseeboy Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 At the moment of selection, with Peters gone and looking at what we had at tackle...oher may have been the better choice. http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Wilson...uick-study.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortured Soul Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 The Ravens only allowed one sack - to a team that had 9 sacks all of last season. Kudos I say! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfreak Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Hindsight is always 20/20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobDVA Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 At the moment of selection, with Peters gone and looking at what we had at tackle...oher may have been the better choice. http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Wilson...uick-study.html In Retrospect, if I would have taken Marla Anderson instead of Sharon Lewis I may have not had my heart shattered into a million pieces and kicked to the curb like so much garbage. However, as time passed, I got over it; as should you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted September 23, 2009 Author Share Posted September 23, 2009 yeah..I never heard of that vrabel guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodnarb Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 It never ceases to amaze me how many grass is greener, "coulda shoulda" posts emerge when some beat writer writes an opinion piece about a player we passed on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 yeah..I never heard of that vrabel guy. Who's what, 45 years old now, and doesn't have Fat Vince, Seymour and Warren, 1st rounders all, in front of him anymore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricojes Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 At the moment of selection, with Peters gone and looking at what we had at tackle...oher may have been the better choice. http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Wilson...uick-study.html Kind of reminds me of how bad the Texans messed up when the drafted M Williams instead of V Young... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 The Ravens only allowed one sack - to a team that had 9 sacks all of last season. Kudos I say! huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 It never ceases to amaze me how many grass is greener, "coulda shoulda" posts emerge when some beat writer writes an opinion piece about a player we passed on. Agreed. But God forbid one of our writers write an opinion piece about one of our players. Then he's simply a lying homer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 The Chefs as a team actually had 10 sacks last year, and Chargers' LDE Jacques Cesaire had 2 sacks last year, and hasn't recorded more than 4 sacks in any of his 6 previous seasons. I think it's safe to say that Oher hasn't really been tested, but he looks like a good player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 At the moment of selection, with Peters gone and looking at what we had at tackle...oher may have been the better choice. http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Wilson...uick-study.html Give it a rest. Draft is over and we are 2 games in to the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phlegm Alley Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 You obviously haven't read that we signed Jamon Meredith off the Packer's practice squad. He would run circles around OHER! In all honesty...who cares about the Ravens and their still wet behind the ears draft pick. Give it some time before you start making comparisons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 I like the Maybin choice. Who knows if he's going to be great as of yet. He needs playing time to show that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Kind of reminds me of how bad the Texans messed up when the drafted M Williams instead of V Young... R. Bush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABills08 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Maybin has gotten a lot of time. Thus, he must be doing something the coaching staff likes. For him, it is going to boil down to bulking up a bit and learning some other moves. He is athletic enough to do both of these things IMO. The other option of course is to use him at linebacker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricojes Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 R. Bush. From a fan stand point, they wanted VY more (since he played a Texas). From a team stand point, it was probably Bush v Williams. But this is a fan board, which is why we keep hearing "Waaa Waaa Waaa, we should have drafted so and so" two games into the freakin season! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 It makes perfect sense to throw Maybin under the bus after two games, as well as the front office for selecting him. Excellent point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 From a fan stand point, they wanted VY more (since he played a Texas). From a team stand point, it was probably Bush v Williams. But this is a fan board, which is why we keep hearing "Waaa Waaa Waaa, we should have drafted so and so" two games into the freakin season! You're right. I thought they got blasted more for Bush but there were some who wanted Young. Can't agree more with your last statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortured Soul Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 huh? Sorry. They had 10 sacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts