freester Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 this would be a good move since he is familiar with the offense, obviously for veteran minimum salary or close to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deep2evans Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 There's a better chance we re-sign McGahee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincec Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 I think that it will be Runyan. In any event, however, I think that Jonathan Scott is going to get the first crack at RT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimBob2232 Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Did we burn the bridge with Walker though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geno Smith's Arm Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Did Walker burn the bridge with the Bills though? Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Fixed Walker did nothing to burn his bridge with the Bills. He simply is regressing in ability and is probably too large to handle the no-huddle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toddgurley Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 this would be a good move since he is familiar with the offense, obviously for veteran minimum salary or close to it. according to the poll-we want runyon over walker LINK: http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?...e=show&st=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 this would be a good move since he is familiar with the offense, obviously for veteran minimum salary or close to it. Langston is not cut out for a no-huddle attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog69 Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Did we burn the bridge with Walker though? I think Walker burned the bridge with Buffalo. From the comments after he left he sounded fat, out of shape and lazy. He's not athletic enough for the no huddle. My guess is they will sign a young guy none of us have heard of who is more athletic and energetic vs fat and slobbery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerme1 Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Langston is not cut out for a no-huddle attack. I'm not too sure that a currently unemployed Runyan can fit that bill either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AF88Bills Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Langston is not cut out for a no-huddle attack. I'd agree with this...did you see him during the preseason...he was sucking big air from the no huddle tempo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geno Smith's Arm Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Walker did nothing to burn his bridge with the Bills. He simply is regressing in ability and is probably too large to handle the no-huddle. I know what you mean, but as it was posed as a question, I think the question is whether he burned the bridge (by not playing well), more than did the Bills burn the bridge. I really doubt they will try to bring him back regardless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts