DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted October 6, 2009 Author Posted October 6, 2009 You are still here, therefore it is proof that the devil does exist. Athiests, quake in your boots!!! atheism is word without content, its like being a non-astrologer...lol
EasternOHBillsFan Posted October 6, 2009 Posted October 6, 2009 atheism is word without content, its like being a non-astrologer...lol At least you have a sense of humor, sir. Enjoy the darkness, and argue on.
DC Tom Posted October 6, 2009 Posted October 6, 2009 doesnt justify belief in zeus idiot... see the difference , i guess not You're the only one suggesting an equivalence.
Adam Posted October 6, 2009 Posted October 6, 2009 ALL HAIL THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER, they are in the same category, u lose! Does it come with meatballs?
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 6, 2009 Posted October 6, 2009 atheism is word without content, its like being a non-astrologer...lol 11pm, isn't that past your bed-time. Do your parents know that you are on the internet this late? You should be in bed so that you can harass your third grade teacher better.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 6, 2009 Posted October 6, 2009 Does it come with meatballs? Seriously, the DEA should check him out, what ever drugs he is doing sure has him messed up... Hey Della you enjoying the pretty colors?
DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted October 14, 2009 Author Posted October 14, 2009 Nobody on here has offered proof for god.... u lose!
erynthered Posted October 14, 2009 Posted October 14, 2009 Nobody on here has offered proof for god.... u lose! You're living proof that God makes some mistakes sometimes.
ieatcrayonz Posted October 14, 2009 Posted October 14, 2009 Does it come with meatballs? I don't understand why the atheists would even care. It's like complaining that the girls you were rejected by in the backseat of your Yugo didn't win Prom Queen. Who gives a darn....move on atheist flying spaghetti monsterers...move on and get over your hatred.
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2009 Posted October 15, 2009 Nobody on here has offered proof for god.... u lose! Only one idiot (hint: you) is even arguing that God's a provable conjecture. Until you get the concept of "unprovable" through your thick skull, you can't even discuss the subject.
DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted October 15, 2009 Author Posted October 15, 2009 Only one idiot (hint: you) is even arguing that God's a provable conjecture. Until you get the concept of "unprovable" through your thick skull, you can't even discuss the subject. DUMB ASS!!! since its not a provable conjecture its not worth believing , there is no reason to believe it. end of story................................................
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2009 Posted October 15, 2009 DUMB ASS!!! since its not a provable conjecture its not worth believing , there is no reason to believe it. end of story................................................ If it were PROVABLE, it wouldn't require BELIEF, you idiot. That's what we've been trying to tell you.
finknottle Posted October 15, 2009 Posted October 15, 2009 If religion is insane in the 21st century, then it probably was insane in the 20th. It's not 'becoming' anything. Religious belief is as retarded or sound as it ever was.
Gene Frenkle Posted October 15, 2009 Posted October 15, 2009 If it were PROVABLE, it wouldn't require BELIEF, you idiot. That's what we've been trying to tell you. In fairness, a lot of people don't 'believe' in Evolution, an evidence-based proposition. I guess it might instead be more accurate to say they don't 'accept' Evolution, but it really amounts to the same thing.
StupidNation Posted October 15, 2009 Posted October 15, 2009 Nobody on here has offered proof for god.... u lose! There are 5 proofs of the existence of God. You are not intelligent to understand them and would probably rehash the hackneyed arguments against them which are sophomoric and easy to pick apart. You should probably get off the soap-box and try to learn something more than your immoral existence has to offer. You may wonder how I can say immoral without knowing you and I can say unequivocally that people who have this huge anti-God/religion platform are always living immoral lifestyles and which to justify their egotistical way of life. I've met some agnostics who weren't militant in their RA-RA I hate God, but didn't find sufficient proof for their intellectual aptitude, but they were naturally good men. Only a deviant and a lunatic would rant and rail against something they don't believe in. Imagine how crazy the anti-Easter Bunny crowd looks...
finknottle Posted October 15, 2009 Posted October 15, 2009 There are 5 proofs of the existence of God. You are not intelligent to understand them and would probably rehash the hackneyed arguments against them which are sophomoric and easy to pick apart. You should probably get off the soap-box and try to learn something more than your immoral existence has to offer. My apologies for not wanting to go back through this 29 page love fest, unneccessarily, but I am intrigued by your 5 proofs of God. Are they contained here, or is there an external link?
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2009 Posted October 15, 2009 In fairness, a lot of people don't 'believe' in Evolution, an evidence-based proposition. I guess it might instead be more accurate to say they don't 'accept' Evolution, but it really amounts to the same thing. A significant difference is that evolution is an evidence-based theory, whereas God is not. Again, the difference between "provable" and "unprovable". Even if you refuse to accept that evolution as it currently stands is unproven, that doesn't make it unprovable. God, on the other hand, by definition is not empirically provable.
John Adams Posted October 15, 2009 Posted October 15, 2009 There are 5 proofs of the existence of God. You are not intelligent to understand them and would probably rehash the hackneyed arguments against them which are sophomoric and easy to pick apart. You should probably get off the soap-box and try to learn something more than your immoral existence has to offer. The 5 proofs, Aristotelian or Aquinas, are not "proofs of the existence of god" except to someone who's a believer. They are proofs that there are certain questions for which we do not know an answer. The believer finds the answer to be god--a leap of faith. The non-believer or reasoned person says something like "I don't know what the first cause is. And that's what I know."
John Adams Posted October 15, 2009 Posted October 15, 2009 My apologies for not wanting to go back through this 29 page love fest, unneccessarily, but I am intrigued by your 5 proofs of God. Are they contained here, or is there an external link? Short version. http://www.jcu.edu/philosophy/gensler/RE/R-B2--00.HTM
Gene Frenkle Posted October 15, 2009 Posted October 15, 2009 There are 5 proofs of the existence of God. You are not intelligent to understand them and would probably rehash the hackneyed arguments against them which are sophomoric and easy to pick apart. You should probably get off the soap-box and try to learn something more than your immoral existence has to offer. You may wonder how I can say immoral without knowing you and I can say unequivocally that people who have this huge anti-God/religion platform are always living immoral lifestyles and which to justify their egotistical way of life. I've met some agnostics who weren't militant in their RA-RA I hate God, but didn't find sufficient proof for their intellectual aptitude, but they were naturally good men. Only a deviant and a lunatic would rant and rail against something they don't believe in. Imagine how crazy the anti-Easter Bunny crowd looks... You may not be retarded, but your second paragraph is. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and are obviously rationalizing with a major agenda. God cannot be proved or disproved, no matter what you claim. Despite your obvious self delusion, the truth is the truth.
Recommended Posts