Ramius Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Took the wrong pills this morning, did you? Nah he's just pissed that Eric King is so great the Titans cut him and he's currently Detroit's dime back, and future HOFer Justin Geisinger was so good that the redskins let him go and he was subsequently cut by Carolina and is no longer in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDairis Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 I didn't see anything quoted from Jimmuh Carter Because Jimmy never committed treason, and clearly is more intelligent than a walnut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Because Jimmy never committed treason, and clearly is more intelligent than a walnut. Someone defending Jimmy Carter. There's something you don't see every day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Today should not be about politics. One of the few times when this board is in total agreement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDairis Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Hey, who stole PPP's Martian translator? How about a Zionist translator for the chronically beaked to parrot from??? http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/07/us/inqui...-cost-drug.html "An internal investigation by the Department of Health and Human Services confirms that the top Medicare official threatened to fire the program's chief actuary if he told Congress that drug benefits would probably cost much more than the White House acknowledged. A report on the investigation, issued Tuesday, says the administrator of Medicare, Thomas A. Scully, issued the threat to Richard S. Foster while lawmakers were considering huge changes in the program last year. As a result, Mr. Foster's cost estimate did not become known until after the legislation was enacted." The one thing that is consistent about W supporters is that they are never offended when it comes out that what they were parroting was intentionally false. LIE TO ME, PLEASE, I AM A W SUPPORTER 1. WMDs 2. Saddam-AQ connection 3. cost of socializing senior drugs 4. document from Niger outed as forgery 5. the "evidence" behind Cheney's claim on Meet the Press Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDairis Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Someone defending Jimmy Carter. There's something you don't see every day. Clearly, you prefer W's Iraq Treason, W's making OBL "not a priority," W's flipping off Iran after deploying our troops in Afghan next to Iranian armed and funded Northern Alliance, which was at war on 911 with Taliban/AQ. W inherited a superpower with a surplus with the ability to unite 120 countries for legit causes, including Afghanistan. W flushed that into the sewer to get re-elected. W's Bible Thumping Socialism took the surplus and turned it into the trillion dollar per year deficit we now have. Carter's economic performance, sad and socialist as it was, did nowhere near the damage W's did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 I think it's Owens Maniac Alter Ego in some bizarro parallel world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDairis Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Nah he's just pissed that Eric King is so great the Titans cut him and he's currently Detroit's dime back, and future HOFer Justin Geisinger was so good that the redskins let him go and he was subsequently cut by Carolina and is no longer in the league. Eric King was not cut by the Titans. He got money in FA from the Lions, and, I believe, is contending for starter... http://content.usatoday.com/topics/more+ar...s/NFL/Eric+King "He could start along with cornerback Eric King, but that competition is still ongoing. “Eric’s been doing a good job, he’s fighting for the starting job." Justin won the backup C job in Wash last year, and was active all games before he tore his knee again. He was one of the Panthers last cuts. He may not be done yet. Eric King - fifth round Justin Geisinger - sixth round STILL AROUND since the 2005 NFL Draft... yet most drafted in those rounds are not... but that means they were "bad" picks..... to a 'tard who parrots and cannot handle debate without a "teleprompter" to parrot from... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDairis Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 I think it's Owens Maniac Alter Ego in some bizarro parallel world. When destroyed in debate, one possible tactic is to change the subject and insult your opponent. Indeed, when confronted about his own ego, a certain #81 has done that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 When destroyed in debate, one possible tactic is to change the subject and insult your opponent. Indeed, when confronted about his own ego, a certain #81 has done that... Good Lord, kid. You're not destroying anyone, because no one's debating you, because you're a lunatic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDairis Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Good Lord, kid. You're not destroying anyone, because no one's debating you, because you're a lunatic. It is completely reflexive today to call he who just destroyed you in debate a "lunatic." Point out the growth of Antarctic ice and the lack of any warming in the atmosphere and the left calls you a "lunatic." Point out the truth of what W did post 911 vs. what was our national interest and the "right" calls you a "lunatic." George W Bush had an obligation to pursue the US national interest of finding and wiping out those behind 911. Instead, he sent a way too small force to Afghan (our force there now is 10 times as large as the initial deployment), made our terror "not a priority," and lied to dump our heroes in uniform in Iraq, which had nothing to do with 911, was not a threat, had no WMDs, no AQ or Osama connection. In Afghan as our troops arrived, Taliban (including their elite terror strike force Al Qaeda) was at war with Northern Alliance, who was armed and funded by Iran. Our troops allied with Northern Alliance against Taliban/AQ. Then W put Iran on the "Axis of Evil..." and the ADL gave George Tenet its "highest award" for his record of failing to kill OBL, failing to stop 911, breaking our laws and treaties to 'board Gitmos to lie about Saddam and Osama, and then Tenet lied to the US Senate about WMDs right before the Iraq war vote... That is what you cannot defend, and why you must hide behind your petty, cowardly, and ultimately treasonous insults... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Connor, is that you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 That is what you cannot defend, and why you must hide behind your petty, cowardly, and ultimately treasonous insults... Now DC Tom is being treasonous? That's awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDairis Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Now DC Tom is being treasonous? That's awesome. Hiding, shouting down, and concealing treason is treasonous. Ditto for opposing investigations into treason, as your Zionist masters at the FIXED NOISE are so furious about now... What's the FIXED NOISE parroting about Cheney and investigating him? Or, why do you oppose investigating Cheney?? Different way to phrase the same question... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Now DC Tom is being treasonous? That's awesome. Well that part seems reasonable at least... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Good Lord, kid. You're not destroying anyone, because no one's debating you, because you're a lunatic. But he's doing a bang up job debating himself. I think last night's rain washed him out of the bathtub at Ground Zero. I noticed the water was extra murky this morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chump Change Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Is Blzrul completely off the reservation? Could this be one of her new personalities? Or is Bad Leftennent feeling lonely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 It is completely reflexive today to call he who just destroyed you in debate a "lunatic." Point out the growth of Antarctic ice and the lack of any warming in the atmosphere and the left calls you a "lunatic." Point out the truth of what W did post 911 vs. what was our national interest and the "right" calls you a "lunatic." George W Bush had an obligation to pursue the US national interest of finding and wiping out those behind 911. Instead, he sent a way too small force to Afghan (our force there now is 10 times as large as the initial deployment), made our terror "not a priority," and lied to dump our heroes in uniform in Iraq, which had nothing to do with 911, was not a threat, had no WMDs, no AQ or Osama connection. In Afghan as our troops arrived, Taliban (including their elite terror strike force Al Qaeda) was at war with Northern Alliance, who was armed and funded by Iran. Our troops allied with Northern Alliance against Taliban/AQ. Then W put Iran on the "Axis of Evil..." and the ADL gave George Tenet its "highest award" for his record of failing to kill OBL, failing to stop 911, breaking our laws and treaties to 'board Gitmos to lie about Saddam and Osama, and then Tenet lied to the US Senate about WMDs right before the Iraq war vote... That is what you cannot defend, and why you must hide behind your petty, cowardly, and ultimately treasonous insults... I can't debate you, because you're not even living in reality. I don't think there's a single sentence in the above post that comes close to being correct. The sum total of that post is simply farcical, to the point where it can be dismissed with one simple observation: The invasion of Iraq was legal. Congress voted on it, and voted to authorize it. As a matter of law, it was by definition NOT treasonous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Hiding, shouting down, and concealing treason is treasonous. Ditto for opposing investigations into treason, as your Zionist masters at the FIXED NOISE are so furious about now... What's the FIXED NOISE parroting about Cheney and investigating him? Or, why do you oppose investigating Cheney?? Different way to phrase the same question... Actually, I'm not part of the Zionist conspiracy to conceal Dick Cheney's treason. I'm part of the Bilderberger consipracy to help Don Rumsfeld create the Indian Ocean tsunami and steal Indonesia's oil. Please try to keep your conspiracies straight. We at Bilderberger HQ don't appreciate being lumped together with the Zionists, Illuminati, Masons, Yakuza, or David Icke's Lizard People. We do share a cafeteria with the Scientologists, but that's strictly social and not a working relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 I was at work and a woman came out of the breakroom and said a plane just hit the WTC. All of us went in. I was thinking it was an accident until I saw the second plane hit. "I said holy it's a terrorist attack. The woman who called me in asked me how I knew that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts