Thailog80 Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 ...from "Rub your feet on the carpet and touch a doorknob" all the way up to "extra tasty crispy" ... 114323[/snapback] They should go to his parents house and taser them also.
stevestojan Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 They should go to his parents house and taser them also. 114327[/snapback] like my post above said, I can guarentee that the parents are the posterchildren for white trash. You need a license to sell real estate, but not have a child.
Guest Guest_Buffalo Dave_* Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 That'll teach that kid how to conduct himself.
stevestojan Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 That'll teach that kid how to conduct himself. 114337[/snapback] No, but it will prevent him from STABBING either cop, himself again, or the principal until they can get him the psychiatric help he obviously needs. They didn't do it to punish him.
Ramius Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 yes this more than likely comes from the parents needing to be tasered...but it sounds like the kid was shocked over what the police did to him...maybe this will set the little bastard straight... i for one think people should hafta get a liscence to have kids...hell you need one to drive a car, get married, sell real estate...for crying out loud, you should have seen the stevestojan i had to go through to get certified to work with animals at here at work, and they are just rats... but having a kid...anyone that can figure out how to put part A into slot B can have one...scary thought...
dib Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 All I can say is, that's Miami for ya. Miami is LA of the east, just basically another cesspool of humanity with no direction, at it's finest. Hey! Wait a minute I.......well.......hm, I guess you're right.
mcjeff215 Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 No, but it will prevent him from STABBING either cop, himself again, or the principal until they can get him the psychiatric help he obviously needs. They didn't do it to punish him. 114340[/snapback] Stabbing? I really hope you're kidding. We're talking about a six year old with a piece of glass, not a 14 year old with a machete. For Christ's sake, put on a pair of leather gloves and grab the the kid. Adjustable tazer or not, they're lucky they didn't kill the kid doing that. -Jeff
GG Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 Stabbing? I really hope you're kidding. We're talking about a six year old with a piece of glass, not a 14 year old with a machete. For Christ's sake, put on a pair of leather gloves and grab the the kid. Adjustable tazer or not, they're lucky they didn't kill the kid doing that. -Jeff 114464[/snapback] It's hard to prove anything from reading a news story. But would you not agree that storming a kid, who's already cut his face, arm and leg could cause more damage if he saw the cops moving toward him? Like shearing the hand with which he was holding the glass and tearing every nerve in his palm?
mcjeff215 Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 It's hard to prove anything from reading a news story. But would you not agree that storming a kid, who's already cut his face, arm and leg could cause more damage if he saw the cops moving toward him? Like shearing the hand with which he was holding the glass and tearing every nerve in his palm? 114486[/snapback] All this talk of "protecting" the police from a "stabbing" just boils my blood. Yes, I know tazers are adjustable, but they're just not meant to be used on 6 year olds. You said it though, we don't know enough from the story. He may have been plunging the thing into his leg over and over again, perhaps it was the right measure. It just seems quite wrong to me, as if they had maced him. If it was the only thing they could do to protect the 6 year old, I can (almost) agree with it, but the cops were never in any danger. -Jeff
stevestojan Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 All this talk of "protecting" the police from a "stabbing" just boils my blood. Yes, I know tazers are adjustable, but they're just not meant to be used on 6 year olds. You said it though, we don't know enough from the story. He may have been plunging the thing into his leg over and over again, perhaps it was the right measure. It just seems quite wrong to me, as if they had maced him. If it was the only thing they could do to protect the 6 year old, I can (almost) agree with it, but the cops were never in any danger. -Jeff 114555[/snapback] You're right. And my one argument was probably wrong. The cops probably could have just charged the kid and grabbed him without any injury to them. But the other point is still 100% valid. If you run at him, and he stabs himself in the neck, throat, leg, etc, etc, and bleeds out, then the cops did the wrong thing. Cops are handcuffed (no pun intended) in their jobs because of judgments like yours.
sweet baboo Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 I see nothing wrong with what the cops did.
Alaska Darin Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 I love reading threads by the experts here. Nothing better than people with no training or real world experience in this stuff judging those who do and were actually there. If you don't think a six year old with broken glass can kill you, look up "femoral artery" in an anatomical dictionary some time. Doesn't take much. And we wonder why cops look at the average citizen as an idiot.
stevestojan Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 I love reading threads by the experts here. Nothing better than people with no training or real world experience in this stuff judging those who do and were actually there. 114575[/snapback] I agree with you on the point of your post, but something I have learned about you in the past year or so: You are smarter, more experienced, and just plain "bettter" than everyone else here. Man, you can never just put in your $.02, can you? It's always your two cents either followed by or pre-empted with "You are all morons, I am a genious, and here's why:"
Alaska Darin Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 I agree with you on the point of your post, but something I have learned about you in the past year or so: You are smarter, more experienced, and just plain "bettter" than everyone else here. Man, you can never just put in your $.02, can you? It's always your two cents either followed by or pre-empted with "You are all morons, I am a genious, and here's why:" 114583[/snapback] Because I can spell genius.
stevestojan Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 Because I can spell genius. 114585[/snapback] PERFECT example. Thank you.
Cutting Drew With Dignity Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 Because I can spell genius. 114585[/snapback] But can you spell porn, beernoculars, or business professional?
Alaska Darin Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 PERFECT example. Thank you. 114590[/snapback] You're welcome.
stevestojan Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 Yes, I have a life besides belittling others. Going to Bills games and drinking beer. Looking at porn. And working. Remind me again though, who the f-ck are you?
Alaska Darin Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 But can you spell porn, beernoculars, or business professional? 114594[/snapback] I can but I don't watch "Lost" so obviously I'll never be part of the crowd. Whoa is me.
Recommended Posts