SDS Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 [This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.
Got_Wood Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 Yeah, it's sad that our starter makes less than the backup QB, and about a third of what our kicker and punter make.
Wagon Circler Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 I'm not sure he's worth what we're paying him. You have to be effective to be cost effective.
Alphadawg7 Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 lol, because he wasnt very good in College we got him in the 3rd so he signed cheap...so based on the fact he makes little money, it takes almost no production to be "cost effective"... I cant wait for the Trent apologists to get a hold of this one...lmao...
Recommended Posts