San Jose Bills Fan Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 There once was a player named Seymour who on a map couldn't find Timor. He said of Buffalo, does not that mean snow? I'd rather get traded to B-more.
Buffalo Mike1 Posted September 8, 2009 Author Posted September 8, 2009 Git 'er Done. A line with Seymour, Maybin, Stroud and Williams all of the sudden looks like a strength rather than a weakness. Take out Williams, insert Shobel.
superbowl Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 I could see Al Davis going for Roscoe Parrish and a 2nd round pick for Seymour, considering how much he likes the speedy/explosive player archetype. I'm just not convinced that would be prudent for the Bills - the fact that the Pats traded him seems to indicate to me that he is not performing at a level required to run an effective 3-4. If we had a larger presence at DE opposite from Seymour, maybe we take a chance and convert to a 3-4 to utilize Maybin at OLB, but I don't see that as feasible at all as is. I believe the Pats are going to a 4-3 and this was part of the reason for trading Seymour. They may have a mix of both, but they would be remiss in not using the 3-4 against us at least at some level given our inability to do anything against a 3-4.
Thoner7 Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 Better record last year.More talent. Less senile owner. More accomplished head coach. Less potentially criminally liable head coach. More explosive weapons on offense. Fewer concealed weapons in the locker room. A better quarterback. More talent on defense. ETC ETC ETC The only thing our coach has accomplished is a losing record. Tom Cable hasnt lost yet. Cable: 0 Jauron: -7 (1 winning season in 8 as a head coach)
Recommended Posts