Bad Lieutenant Posted September 5, 2009 Posted September 5, 2009 http://www.mercurynews.com/49ers/ci_13275374?nclick_check=1 Even some of the players with a secure employment have things to worry about. Most disconcertingly for the 49ers is the play of struggling cornerback Nate Clements, who played just one series but still found time to surrender a 39-yard touchdown pass to Kassim Osgood. That was Clements' last play before the real thing. The 49ers open the regular season next week Advertisement against defending NFC champion Arizona and showstopping receiver Larry Fitzgerald. "Nate knows he has to get better,'' Singletary said. "He has to be more detailed about what he's doing and be more consistent. We'll address that going forward."
PromoTheRobot Posted September 5, 2009 Posted September 5, 2009 I'm sure his meager $80 million contract was weighing on his mind. Just ask Jason Peters, how is a guy supposed to keep his mind on the game when he has to feed his family? PTR
ThereIsNoDog Posted September 5, 2009 Posted September 5, 2009 Just think, Nate would be the Bills' struggling $9M/year man, if only Ralph weren't so cheap as to not pay him.
colin Posted September 5, 2009 Posted September 5, 2009 except for phat pat williams (who was my favorite bill) and london fletcher the bills have looked pretty brilliant in who they let go. i don't think clements would crack our starting lineup come week 8 of this year.
Bad Lieutenant Posted September 5, 2009 Author Posted September 5, 2009 except for phat pat williams (who was my favorite bill) and london fletcher the bills have looked pretty brilliant in who they let go. i don't think clements would crack our starting lineup come week 8 of this year. And Antoine Winfield.
GOBILLS78 Posted September 5, 2009 Posted September 5, 2009 Clements is struggling with consistency? No...
GOBILLS78 Posted September 5, 2009 Posted September 5, 2009 except for phat pat williams (who was my favorite bill) and london fletcher the bills have looked pretty brilliant in who they let go. i don't think clements would crack our starting lineup come week 8 of this year. On the same token, it might show the lack of talent the Bills had in the first place.
lets_go_bills Posted September 5, 2009 Posted September 5, 2009 He got paid, now he's lazy. No surprise there.
Steely Dan Posted September 5, 2009 Posted September 5, 2009 Just think, Nate would be the Bills' struggling $9M/year man, if only Ralph weren't so cheap as to not pay him.
Recommended Posts