BuffaloBill Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 Two in custody What a stunning development for all that are involved. You do have to wonder why it took her 18 years to come forward.
ans4e64 Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 That's got to be weird for the parents. Probably at least 15 years of living your life believing your daughter was dead.
BuffaloBill Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 That's got to be weird for the parents. Probably at least 15 years of living your life believing your daughter was dead. It is hard to imagine the thoughts and emotions that would go through your mind. Talk about a shock to the system. It's sad and maybe even cruel to think this situation probably perpetuates false hope for many other parents who will never see a lost child again.
Britbillsfan Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 You do have to wonder why it took her 18 years to come forward. Fear. Brainwashing. Lack of opportunity. There are quit a few possibilities, there have been a couple of similar cases in Austria the last few years and the victims accepted captivity as 'normal'. It must be a wonderful day for her parents after all this time to have their daughter finally returned.
BuffaloBill Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 Fear. Brainwashing. Lack of opportunity. There are quit a few possibilities, there have been a couple of similar cases in Austria the last few years and the victims accepted captivity as 'normal'. It must be a wonderful day for her parents after all this time to have their daughter finally returned. Agree on all points.
loyal2dagame Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 What a stunning development for all that are involved. You do have to wonder why it took her 18 years to come forward. in this case for the parents it's better late than never
Chef Jim Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 Was she naked with a poodle under one are and a frog under the other?
Beerball Posted August 27, 2009 Author Posted August 27, 2009 Was she naked with a poodle under one are and a frog under the other? No, you missing a poodle and a frog?
BuffaloBill Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 No, you missing a poodle and a frog? They are his favorite adult toys you know.
The Poojer Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 i was expecting a punch line also...... Was she naked with a poodle under one are and a frog under the other?
Chef Jim Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 No, you missing a poodle and a frog? Hell no, I'm missing a naked woman.
Steely Dan Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 This is certainly one for the WTF file. Nice ending though.
Beerball Posted August 27, 2009 Author Posted August 27, 2009 This is certainly one for the WTF file. Nice ending though. Hope so, but cincy is right.
Steely Dan Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 Fear. Brainwashing. Lack of opportunity. There are quit a few possibilities, there have been a couple of similar cases in Austria the last few years and the victims accepted captivity as 'normal'. It must be a wonderful day for her parents after all this time to have their daughter finally returned. Was she naked with a poodle under one are and a frog under the other? You can't possibly think this is a thread to joke in can you? Oh wait, obviously you do.
The Poojer Posted August 28, 2009 Posted August 28, 2009 as did I.....if we couldn't laugh...we'd all go insane You can't possibly think this is a thread to joke in can you? Oh wait, obviously you do.
Steely Dan Posted August 28, 2009 Posted August 28, 2009 as did I.....if we couldn't laugh...we'd all go insane Too soon. JMO
The Poojer Posted August 28, 2009 Posted August 28, 2009 come on...its been 18 years.......OH NO I DI'INT actually if you just look at the thread...my first thought was "A baby harp seal walks into a club" type of joke.....I am glad this has ended the way it apparently has....I don't think Chef had any ill intent...I know I didn't. and that o'reilly link was kind of lame...there were no lies or hypocracies as the poster of the video titled it...o'reilly's initial reaction was to reject the stockholm syndrome..in his opinion....when the report revealed what the fbi investigation found...he was appalled at what the outcome was....the poster of that video simply has his/her panties in a wad over o'reilly and wanted to bash him..... Too soon. JMO
Booster4324 Posted August 28, 2009 Posted August 28, 2009 and that o'reilly link was kind of lame...there were no lies or hypocracies as the poster of the video titled it...o'reilly's initial reaction was to reject the stockholm syndrome..in his opinion....when the report revealed what the fbi investigation found...he was appalled at what the outcome was....the poster of that video simply has his/her panties in a wad over o'reilly and wanted to bash him..... Still, he didn't re-air the tape and never apologized to the family, much less the kid. It was incredibly stupid for him to make the initial comments without knowledge of what was going on. Greta Van Susteren was smart enough to avoid the topic. Oh and blaming it on a different syndrome? Child sexual abuse syndrome? Weak IMO.
Recommended Posts