Campy Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 My point wasn't so much that sooo many people believed those things. It was more so that just because some people believed it to be ok, it didn't make it ok. All I am saying is, you are going to need to come up with a better argument than "half the country thinks it's ok" to tell me that homosexuality is less wrong than incest. 115041[/snapback] Gotcha'.
ofiba Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 Sorry but please share your beliefs with us,...tell us what a wondeful christian you are on a daily basis. I was raised to believe that my beliefs are something that you do not speak out about in public 115048[/snapback] I apologize, I wasn't trying to say what a horrible Christian you are. I was simply trying to clarify the point Fergy was trying to make. He was trying to say you can't call yourself a practicing Catholic if you don't believe everything Catholics believe. (Pro-life, abstinance)
cåblelady Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging. 112088[/snapback] Hmmm....not ONE mention from the New Testament? These laws were all from the Old Testament.......BC. That's the difference.
Alaska Darin Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 I would like to know where you got those numbers from. 114996[/snapback] He pulled them out of his ass. [/irony]
ofiba Posted November 12, 2004 Posted November 12, 2004 IU'm sorry you opinion has to be right.........our opinions could not hold any water 115050[/snapback] Haha, my post actually said that something can't be true just because it is someone's opinion. I am asking for you to give me a reason why homosexuality is ok and incest is not other than saying "more people think homosexuality is ok". No one has yet to do that. This tells me that there would be no way to keep incest out of marriage if we allow homosexuals to get married. What would we tell people who want to marry their brothers and sisters?? "Uh... ummmm... well, not enough people think this is ok to do, so we can't allow it??" After homosexuals are allowed to wed, a snowball effect will occur forcing the country to allow pretty much anyone to get married. UNLESS, someone here can tell me what makes incest and homosexuality different, other than the current opinions of Americans.
Campy Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 It was an impossible request to fulfill, gmac. Libs are always surprised when Bush isn't as extreme as their talking points tell them. Once they have to fend for themselves, it all falls apart. 115056[/snapback] I have already responded to that post, but I'll repeat the question I asked in my response: Does Bush oppose gay marriage because of religious beliefs (which I believe would be misguided, but understandable), or does he just condone descrimination against homosexuals (which would be an abomination)?
VabeachBledsoefan Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 I apologize, I wasn't trying to say what a horrible Christian you are. I was simply trying to clarify the point Fergy was trying to make. He was trying to say you can't call yourself a practicing Catholic if you don't believe everything Catholics believe. (Pro-life, abstinance) 115062[/snapback] I understand that.....if I have a strong belief in my faith...that is all that matters...I feel God made us to be free thinkers....no I don't believe in every published Catholic belief or opinion, but no person will decide if my way of professing my faith is right or wrong
ofiba Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 I understand that.....if I have a strong belief in my faith...that is all that matters...I feel God made us to be free thinkers....no I don't believe in every published Catholic belief or opinion, but no person will decide if my way of professing my faith is right or wrong 115073[/snapback] I respect that. It's better formulate your own beliefs rather than have a religion decide your beliefs for you.
Campy Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 I am asking for you to give me a reason why homosexuality is ok and incest is not other than saying "more people think homosexuality is ok". 115067[/snapback] I'll give you two, and you can twist whichever one you think will be easiest to try and justify your opposition to gay marriage. Reason 1- Incest is a crime, homosexuality is not. Reason 2- Children born of incestuous couples have a much higher chance of birth defect than those born of homosexual couples.
VabeachBledsoefan Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 Haha, my post actually said that something can't be true just because it is someone's opinion. I am asking for you to give me a reason why homosexuality is ok and incest is not other than saying "more people think homosexuality is ok". No one has yet to do that. This tells me that there would be no way to keep incest out of marriage if we allow homosexuals to get married. What would we tell people who want to marry their brothers and sisters?? "Uh... ummmm... well, not enough people think this is ok to do, so we can't allow it??" After homosexuals are allowed to wed, a snowball effect will occur forcing the country to allow pretty much anyone to get married. UNLESS, someone here can tell me what makes incest and homosexuality different, other than the current opinions of Americans. 115067[/snapback] I simply feel that homosexuals are part of the fabric of our society...and yes I have very close gay friends that are living together, in a committed relationship. They have been together 15 years....they deserve rights afforded any other civil union. Its a standard of our society not to marry your sister, its also a standard not to have many wives or marry a pig, so no, it won't spiral out of control. Why does it bother you so much that a gay couple can get life insurance together. I wonder how many gays or lesbians are part of GWB's administration
ofiba Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 I'll give you two, and you can twist whichever one you think will be easiest to try and justify your opposition to gay marriage. Reason 2- Children born of incestuous couples have a much higher chance of birth defect than those born of homosexual couples. 115079[/snapback] You can't be serious with this.... First of all, incestuous couples don't have to have babies. They could easily get married and not have kids. Second...could you please explain to me how homosexuals could ever give birth to a child???
Campy Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 Second...could you please explain to me how homosexuals could ever give birth to a child??? 115083[/snapback] InVitro fertilization or surrogate mother.
VabeachBledsoefan Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 You can't be serious with this.... First of all, incestuous couples don't have to have babies. They could easily get married and not have kids. Second...could you please explain to me how homosexuals could ever give birth to a child??? 115083[/snapback] Are you serious...how do you think that Rosie O'Donnell had her kids...two were adopted...one by vitro
ofiba Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 I simply feel that homosexuals are part of the fabric of our society...and yes I have very close gay friends that are living together, in a committed relationship. They have been together 15 years....they deserve rights afforded any other civil union. Its a standard of our society not to marry your sister, its also a standard not to have many wives or marry a pig, so no, it won't spiral out of control. Why does it bother you so much that a gay couple can get life insurance together. I wonder how many gays or lesbians are part of GWB's administration 115082[/snapback] But was it once not a standard of our society not to marry someone of the same sex?? The point is, standards can change. I don't think letting some homosexual couples get life insurance is the problem, it is about the sanctity of marriage and the chaos that could ensue afterwards once the dam is broken.
Campy Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 But was it once not a standard of our society not to marry someone of the same sex?? The point is, standards can change. I don't think letting some homosexual couples get life insurance is the problem, it is about the sanctity of marriage and the chaos that could ensue afterwards once the dam is broken. 115092[/snapback] So if wasn't a "marriage," but some other form of legally recognized committment, that'd be cool by you?
ofiba Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 Are you serious...how do you think that Rosie O'Donnell had her kids...two were adopted...one by vitro 115091[/snapback] Well in vitro would not be a homosexual couples baby, it would be a baby from a man and a woman. If you want to do that, couldn't a incestual couple simply get in vitro fertilization from an outside source other than in the family and have a completely healthy baby?? It goes both ways.
ofiba Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 So if wasn't a "marriage," but some other form of legally recognized committment, that'd be cool by you? 115096[/snapback] I suppose I may be able to live with that, but the problem would still be, where would the line be drawn? If they are allowed to have equal rights, who else would ask for them as well? Roommates? A son supporting his mother? A couple of best friends trying to cheat the system?
VabeachBledsoefan Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 But was it once not a standard of our society not to marry someone of the same sex?? The point is, standards can change. I don't think letting some homosexual couples get life insurance is the problem, it is about the sanctity of marriage and the chaos that could ensue afterwards once the dam is broken. 115092[/snapback] Yes the standards change...some every day...I want my gay friends to be recognized as a couple in society with equal rights as any hetersexual in a union...it does not have to be through marriage, but if it is recognized by marriage I have no problem. Please explain the millions of Americans that have little respect for the institute of marriage by getting divorced....hey I even friends that consider themselves part of the Christian Right...some divorced once some divorced twice. How can that be explained. In today's society, obviously marriage is not revered as in decades past
cåblelady Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 I suppose I may be able to live with that, but the problem would still be, where would the line be drawn? If they are allowed to have equal rights, who else would ask for them as well? Roommates? A son supporting his mother? A couple of best friends trying to cheat the system? 115099[/snapback] I'd like an equitable share of my ex-husband's benefits, please.
VabeachBledsoefan Posted November 13, 2004 Posted November 13, 2004 I suppose I may be able to live with that, but the problem would still be, where would the line be drawn? If they are allowed to have equal rights, who else would ask for them as well? Roommates? A son supporting his mother? A couple of best friends trying to cheat the system? 115099[/snapback] I understand where you are coming from, but I don't think a reasonable American would be considering equal rights with their roommate or mother...as liberal as I am..please don't make me have a union with my mom. no matter what the laws of this land are...people will always try to cheat the system
Recommended Posts