Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rashad Baker was cut by the Eagles today.

 

He played in 10 games last year, starting in 1 game. He had 3 INTS.

 

 

Is that not more than anyone here had last year? I would like to bring him back in, he would be better than 1/2 the safeties we have right now, in my opinion. Definitly worth a look, moreso than Spann.

 

What's there to lose? We want "Playmakers" right?

Posted
Rashad Baker was cut by the Eagles today.

 

He played in 10 games last year, starting in 1 game. He had 3 INTS.

 

 

Is that not more than anyone here had last year? I would like to bring him back in, he would be better than 1/2 the safeties we have right now, in my opinion. Definitly worth a look, moreso than Spann.

 

What's there to lose? We want "Playmakers" right?

 

Baker was awful. The INT is perhaps the most meaningless and incomplete of all mainstream NFL statistics.

Posted
Baker was awful. The INT is perhaps the most meaningless and incomplete of all mainstream NFL statistics.

 

No he wasn't.

 

I liked him as a player, too. I thought he was very solid whenever he was called upon and seemed to be in the right place to make a play most of the time. I remember I was kind of sad to see him go.

Posted
I liked him as a player, too. I thought he was very solid whenever he was called upon and seemed to be in the right place to make a play most of the time. I remember I was kind of sad to see him go.

He hit like a ton of bricks. He was better than people are giving him credit for here.

Posted
Maybe he didn't suck for a benchwarmer, but the notion that he's a "playmaker" because he got 3 INTs last year is completely fallacious.

 

:lol: I agree.

Posted
Rashad Baker was cut by the Eagles today.

 

He played in 10 games last year, starting in 1 game. He had 3 INTS.

 

 

Is that not more than anyone here had last year? I would like to bring him back in, he would be better than 1/2 the safeties we have right now, in my opinion. Definitly worth a look, moreso than Spann.

 

What's there to lose? We want "Playmakers" right?

 

Any news on effing Lonnie Johnson. <_<

Posted
Baker was awful. The INT is perhaps the most meaningless and incomplete of all mainstream NFL statistics.

 

 

Especially for safeties

Posted
Especially for safeties

 

...who play with teams that can't rush the passer.

 

 

Unless of course it's Donte Whitner, who sucks because he was picked #8.

Posted
Baker was awful. The INT is perhaps the most meaningless and incomplete of all mainstream NFL statistics.

Interceptions are meaningless? You must play safety for the Buffalo Bills. <_<

Posted
Interceptions are meaningless? You must play safety for the Buffalo Bills. <_<

 

 

The interceptions aren't meaningless, but for a safety they are a very poor metric for judging quality.

Posted
Interceptions are meaningless? You must play safety for the Buffalo Bills. <_<

 

Interceptions are meaningful. The interceptions statistic is deceptive and virtually meaningless, compared to other metrics into which the average fan doesn't care to delve.

Posted
Especially for safeties

 

For example Oshiomogho Atogwe, Michael Griffin, and Troy Polamalu are all awful safeties that just happened to have a ton of INTs, whereas Bryan Scott and Donte Whitner are great safeties that just happened to get no INTs.

×
×
  • Create New...