Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 14, 2009 Author Share Posted September 14, 2009 I'll wait until Edwards plays a few games this season. That's what I thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 That's what I thought. What does Sanchez over Edwards have to do with anything? Not being sold on Edwards does not make Sanchez into a good player. The fact is that Sanchez did not play very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 What does Sanchez over Edwards have to do with anything? Not being sold on Edwards does not make Sanchez into a good player. The fact is that Sanchez did not play very well. The fact that you are unwilling to stake your claim with a third year pro vs. a guy off his first NFL start speaks volumes. We've had 3 years to 'get sold' on Edwards yet you can't back him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 14, 2009 Author Share Posted September 14, 2009 The fact that you are unwilling to stake your claim with a third year pro vs. a guy off his first NFL start speaks volumes. We've had 3 years to 'get sold' on Edwards yet you can't back him. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 The fact that you are unwilling to stake your claim with a third year pro vs. a guy off his first NFL start speaks volumes. We've had 3 years to 'get sold' on Edwards yet you can't back him. What's your point? Not being sold on Edwards has nothing to do with how good Sanchez is. I will say this, I think that Edwards will have a better season than Sanchez. If the Texans had caught the passes that hit them right in chest... no one would be talking about how good Sanchez is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 14, 2009 Author Share Posted September 14, 2009 What's your point? Not being sold on Edwards has nothing to do with how good Sanchez is. I will say this, I think that Edwards will have a better season than Sanchez. If the Texans had caught the passes that hit them right in chest... no one would be talking about how good Sanchez is. If my aunt had nuts she'd be my uncle. Kid made big plays, and at critical times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 If my aunt had nuts she'd be my uncle. Kid made big plays, and at critical times. We'll see what kind of season Sanchez has if he keeps throwing the ball into defenders bread baskets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 14, 2009 Author Share Posted September 14, 2009 We'll see what kind of season Sanchez has if he keeps throwing the ball into defenders bread baskets. Concur. We'll see how good he is when he's torching our D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 The fact that you are unwilling to stake your claim with a third year pro vs. a guy off his first NFL start speaks volumes. We've had 3 years to 'get sold' on Edwards yet you can't back him. I can't think of many players who are able to thrive under Jauron, can you? Edwards checks down, Whitner plays in the stands, McKelvin doesn't challenge wideouts and Schobel is back in freaking pass coverage. Seriously, Jaurons method of coaching isn't geared towards getting the max out of his players. He coaches to not lose as we well know. One slim hope I cling to is the new guards. Perhaps this indicates some sort of commitment to running the football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 I can't think of many players who are able to thrive under Jauron, can you? Edwards checks down, Whitner plays in the stands, McKelvin doesn't challenge wideouts and Schobel is back in freaking pass coverage. Seriously, Jaurons method of coaching isn't geared towards getting the max out of his players. He coaches to not lose as we well know. One slim hope I cling to is the new guards. Perhaps this indicates some sort of commitment to running the football. Hear ya. Someone (RR) mentioned developing players in a thread last week & I asked who the last player we actually developed. If just doesn't happen with this staff. Our players tend to regress to 3.5 rather than actually improve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heels20X6 Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 I can't think of many players who are able to thrive under Jauron, can you? Edwards checks down, Whitner plays in the stands, McKelvin doesn't challenge wideouts and Schobel is back in freaking pass coverage. Seriously, Jaurons method of coaching isn't geared towards getting the max out of his players. He coaches to not lose as we well know. One slim hope I cling to is the new guards. Perhaps this indicates some sort of commitment to running the football. Billiam, I think you, I and a few others are the only ones who truly believe NO PLAYER can thrive under Jauron's system. His inability in FOUR YEARS to find a suitable OC, a defense that prides itself on how long it can keep the opposing team's offense on the field before they score and overall ineptitude in preparing his offense to play a 3-4 defense to me speaks volumes of how this team will never be successful under this idiot. How many of you honestly think Belichek had any worries about going head-to-head with Jauron tonight? Stop blaming Trent, or the young O-line, or Evans or Lynch or Whitner....none of these guys will amount to anything under Jauron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 Concur. We'll see how good he is when he's torching our D. What the !@#$ is wrong with you? It's as if your hoping that to happen, or just hedging your bets, either way, pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 14, 2009 Author Share Posted September 14, 2009 What the !@#$ is wrong with you? It's as if your hoping that to happen, or just hedging your bets, either way, pathetic. After ten years, I'm not in the mood for further mediocrity while our rivals get MUCH better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 Billiam, I think you, I and a few others are the only ones who truly believe NO PLAYER can thrive under Jauron's system. His inability in FOUR YEARS to find a suitable OC, a defense that prides itself on how long it can keep the opposing team's offense on the field before they score and overall ineptitude in preparing his offense to play a 3-4 defense to me speaks volumes of how this team will never be successful under this idiot. The above is also the R.Rich train of thought, and you are both correct. As much as I blasted the Whitner selection, the kid didn't draft himself at #8. We want him to intercept passes but he is too busy making tackles after 30 yard gains because he is 60 yards deep. We want sacks from Schobel, but he is covering backs and tight ends in the secondary. McKelvin has the speed to stay with any receiver. Why the 10 yard cushion? Again, I am hoping for a ground attack because if we can run, we will score. TO will get open and take pressure from other receivers, but there has to be a running game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts