Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thankfully one of our colleagues isn't buying this bull sh--.

 

But James Elsner, a climate scientist at Florida State University, said the "rather large levels of uncertainty" in the new study's results gave him pause.

 

"I don't see it as settling the debate on climate change and hurricane activity," said Elsner, who helped develop the statistical methods employed in the new study. "I think it does provide evidence that warmth is important."

 

At the same time, he explained, "the lack of a real tight physical theory between ocean warmth and frequency indicates this is not the smoking gun that would allow us to confidently project what might happen as oceans warm in the future."

Posted
The researchers also used a computer model to simulate 1,500 years of Atlantic storms

 

Computer models can hardly forecast accurately a week in advance, and they believe this is useful? Silly scientists.

×
×
  • Create New...