Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Schobel is better than Burgess, and on about the same level as Thomas.

 

Oh, yeah? Whip out the end-o-meter, and let's have a look.

 

Where do Chris Ellis and Chris Kelsay fit into your metric?

Posted
Oh, yeah? Whip out the end-o-meter, and let's have a look.

 

Where do Chris Ellis and Chris Kelsay fit into your metric?

Burgess is about as good as Kelsay.

Posted
Oh, yeah? Whip out the end-o-meter, and let's have a look.

 

Where do Chris Ellis and Chris Kelsay fit into your metric?

 

You'd need to re-calibrate the "end-o-meter" for those two, but Schobel is definitely better than Burgess.

Posted
Schobel is better than Burgess, and on about the same level as Thomas.

To be honest, I think Bills fans will have to make that call after we see Schobel back this year.

Posted
To be honest, I think Bills fans will have to make that call after we see Schobel back this year.

 

 

Exactly.

Posted
I feel better now :worthy:

Kelsay isn't bad. He is solid against the run, and would average 5-7 sacks a year with a premier pass rusher on the left side.

Posted

GUYS-there is no debate here-the Pats are a better organization top to bottom. They figure out what it takes to win and go and get it. Unlike our dual pillars of continuity of the Bills and Sabres.

Posted
Kelsay isn't bad. He is solid against the run, and would average 5-7 sacks a year with a premier pass rusher on the left side.

 

Which side?

 

BTW, Schobel WAS a "premier" pass rusher, and Kelsay was still nothing.

Posted
GUYS-there is no debate here-the Pats are a better organization top to bottom. They figure out what it takes to win and go and get it. Unlike our dual pillars of continuity of the Bills and Sabres.

Well duh.

 

 

But let's not act like this is the acquisition of the century. They picked up a decent player coming off an injury plagued season.

Posted
Which side?

 

BTW, Schobel WAS a "premier" pass rusher, and Kelsay was still nothing.

Are you that dumb, or just a new fan? Kelsay had a career high 5.5 sacks when Schobel had 14. That's good for a RDE, and obviously you don't know the difference between a LDE and a RDE.

Posted
Are you that dumb, or just a new fan?

 

 

You've seen his posts and you still have to ask that question. He's that dumb, all right.

Posted
Just what we needed. :worthy: Burgess

 

Meh, no great loss. The Pets* overpaid for him.

 

 

The guy had 2 good years on a very bad team, hopefully he will not return to his previous best while playing for the Pats. He is injury prone only playing a full season twice...does anyone know what the Pats gave up for him?

 

What he said.

Posted
Are you that dumb, or just a new fan? Kelsay had a career high 5.5 sacks when Schobel had 14. That's good for a RDE, and obviously you don't know the difference between a LDE and a RDE.

 

Pray tell, does Schobel play RDE or LDE? Ditto Kelsay.

 

Who said,

...He (Kelsay) is solid against the run, and would average 5-7 sacks a year with a premier pass rusher on the left side.
?
Posted

This is terrible news.

 

I'm amused by all the posters that don't think this is a big deal. The same guys would be doing cartwheels in thier front lawn if we signed this guy.

 

Hopefully this doesn't turn out like that other disgruntled raider the pat :worthy: s* signed

×
×
  • Create New...