RI Bills Fan Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 The Legions of Negative Nancy Posters are bad enough, but at least they're (for the most part) Bills Fans. They want to see the Bills Win and express their frustrations with the long playoff drought by whining and bitching about anything and everything; they're annoying but (barely) tolerable. But do we really have to put up with this latest invasion of Cheatriot* Fangirls and Outright Trolls? I seriously doubt any other board would tolerate Billistic, Mr WEO, jws9999, 4th&1, Sparticus, and their ilk for more than a few posts, yet here they're allowed to hang around and be a$$holes seemingly forever. WHY?
Guest dog14787 Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 The Legions of Negative Nancy Posters are bad enough, but at least they're (for the most part) Bills Fans. They want to see the Bills Win and express their frustrations with the long playoff drought by whining and bitching about anything and everything; they're annoying but (barely) tolerable. But do we really have to put up with this latest invasion of Cheatriot* Fangirls and Outright Trolls? I seriously doubt any other board would tolerate Billistic, Mr WEO, jws9999, 4th&1, and their ilk for more than a few posts, yet here they're allowed to hang around and be a$$holes seemingly forever. WHY? I could be mistaken, but In my opinion it seems like the Mods have kicked it up a notch here lately. Freedom of speech comes with a cost and there's only so much the Mods can do unless of course you want a forum that's so heavily censored, your thoughts and opinions are no longer even allowed for fear of offending someone else.
BillsWatch Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 At least honest trolls admit not being Bills fans; many of Nancy Reagan's tea party admit to not even watching Bills anymore and just using stats from websites.
HurlyBurly51 Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 many of Nancy Reagan's tea party admit to not even watching Bills anymore and just using stats from websites. That's pathetic.
H2o Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 At least honest trolls admit not being Bills fans; many of Nancy Reagan's tea party admit to not even watching Bills anymore and just using stats from websites. Spot on
jwws9999 Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 The Legions of Negative Nancy Posters are bad enough, but at least they're (for the most part) Bills Fans. They want to see the Bills Win and express their frustrations with the long playoff drought by whining and bitching about anything and everything; they're annoying but (barely) tolerable. But do we really have to put up with this latest invasion of Cheatriot* Fangirls and Outright Trolls? I seriously doubt any other board would tolerate Billistic, Mr WEO, jws9999, 4th&1, and their ilk for more than a few posts, yet here they're allowed to hang around and be a$$holes seemingly forever. WHY? probably because it's hard to argue with the truth
Billistic Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 First let's stomp out the elitist, name-calling pom pom girls.
Billistic Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 What do you call someone who mindlessly roots for a perennial loser, and decries anyone who criticizes the loser's countless blunders?
Billistic Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 BTW, who said, "". . . .to announce that there must be no criticism of the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile but is morally treasonable to the American public." ?
Fingon Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 BTW, who said, "". . . .to announce that there must be no criticism of the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile but is morally treasonable to the American public." ? Trolling is not an accepted form of criticism.
Billistic Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 Trolling is not an accepted form of criticism. Either coerce the site moderators to pervert their own TOS, so that they can ban me according to your whims, or grow up and deal with the fact that different minds perceive the same circumstances differently.
Whites Bay Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 BTW, who said, "". . . .to announce that there must be no criticism of the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile but is morally treasonable to the American public." ? I guessed it correctly, but Googled it to make sure. T.R. Read "Theodore Rex". Great biography. But what the hell does that have to do with inane posts from Pats* fans? No one is criticizing the President in this thread. On the Fox News Network, on the other hand, they have people calling him a racist.
Billistic Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 I guessed it correctly, but Googled it to make sure. T.R. Read "Theodore Rex". Great biography. But what the hell does that have to do with inane posts from Pats* fans? No one is criticizing the President in this thread. On the Fox News Network, on the other hand, they have people calling him a racist. Check out the thread originator's signature. Both ironic and hilarious in equal measure.
BillsWatch Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 use ignore. it works for me Ignore feature doesn't work when people are quoted constantly.
Fingon Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 Either coerce the site moderators to pervert their own TOS, so that they can ban me according to your whims, or grow up and deal with the fact that different minds perceive the same circumstances differently. I said nothing about banning you. If the mods want to, then so be it, but you can't deny that many of your posts are made for the purpose of inspiring angered responses, not logical debate.
Billistic Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 I said nothing about banning you. If the mods want to, then so be it, but you can't deny that many of your posts are made for the purpose of inspiring angered responses, not logical debate. I certainly deny your fatuous claim. I will argue the football merits of my posts any time. Many of "you guys", immediately stoop to name calling, in lieu of logic. If that I'm not a "please" and "thank you" kind of poster irritates you, your problem.
Fingon Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 I certainly deny your fatuous claim. I will argue the football merits of my posts any time. Many of "you guys", immediately stoop to name calling, in lieu of logic. If that I'm not a "please" and "thank you" kind of poster irritates you, your problem. http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=91639&hl= Yes, that post was clearly designed to inspire healthy debate.
scoring is not hardy Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 Ignore feature doesn't work when people are quoted constantly. true. Guess we have to stop feeding them. OP does have a point though, it seems like we are overrun with these type of posters. It must be a pretty miserable existence to sit around a spew sarcastic negativity all the time.
Recommended Posts