Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah, and they also didn't specify that the rabbis were Jewish. Simply outrageous.

Posted

It happens constantly. If A Republican gets in trouble, it's in the first sentence , next to their name. If its a dem, it's omitted or in the end of the article. There are hundreds upon hundreds of examples of this.

Posted

Oh waaaaaaaa! waaaaaaa! waaaaaa!

 

WHO CARES?

 

The people watching the evening news (median age 60) are most likely sheep by your definition, so why do you care what their shepherd does? What's the big deal? Fox mis-tags pols all the time, but Fox viewers have already made up their minds, so where's the harm?

Posted
It happens constantly. If A Republican gets in trouble, it's in the first sentence , next to their name. If its a dem, it's omitted or in the end of the article. There are hundreds upon hundreds of examples of this.

 

This happens constantly; Small impish creatures called Greebs crawl through your mouth and into your intestines when you sleep at night and kill bacteria with tiny hammers. There are hundreds upon hundreds of examples of this.

Posted
This happens constantly; Small impish creatures called Greebs crawl through your mouth and into your intestines when you sleep at night and kill bacteria with tiny hammers. There are hundreds upon hundreds of examples of this.

I have no idea what this means, but it is hysterical! :lol:

Posted
This happens constantly; Small impish creatures called Greebs crawl through your mouth and into your intestines when you sleep at night and kill bacteria with tiny hammers. There are hundreds upon hundreds of examples of this.

 

:lol:

 

Wacka's actually right, though. (Yes, it hurts saying that.) But it's not some nefarious plot to warp the minds of the public. The media industry is largely Democratic (something like 80%, by voting records), and as such suffers from the narrow but perfectly natural point of view of thinking that everyone else is just like them, and thus that anyone different must be labelled as different for clarification (i.e. "responsible reporting").

 

It's akin to somebody who's very active in their church community unconsciously assuming that everyone they meet is Christian, because everyone they associate with on a regular basis is Christian. It's not sinister, just a natural bias to being largely absorbed in an insular and homogenous social environment.

 

In fact, the only major news network I've seen that comes close to even-handedly labelling people as Democrat or Republican is Fox News. I presume, though, that that's a self-serving concession to "fair and balanced" intended to distract people from the fact that they're really not.

Posted
In fact, the only major news network I've seen that comes close to even-handedly labelling people as Democrat or Republican is Fox News. I presume, though, that that's a self-serving concession to "fair and balanced" intended to distract people from the fact that they're really not.

Isn't FOX the network that has a tendency to mis-label the party of troubled politicians? And I think it has only happened when a GOP member gets into deep doo-doo.

Posted
Isn't FOX the network that has a tendency to mis-label the party of troubled politicians? And I think it has only happened when a GOP member gets into deep doo-doo.

 

They do tend to mislabel...but I've usually attributed that to the fact that they're a sh------- news organization. "Fair and balanced" does not equal "truthful and accurate".

Posted
And Fox identified Mark Sanford and Mark Foley as Democrats, who gives a sh--?

 

:lol:

 

It happens constantly. If A Republican gets in trouble, it's in the first sentence , next to their name. If its a dem, it's omitted or in the end of the article. There are hundreds upon hundreds of examples of this.

 

I find that to be false. When CNN or the local paper or any other media I read publishes a politicians story they haven't named the party. I've had to search the net to find out what party they belong to, if I'm curious. I've also seen MSNBC talk about Democrats and identify them when talking about some crimes. I'm sure nobody on the right has noticed that and written an article praising them for that.

 

They do tend to mislabel...but I've usually attributed that to the fact that they're a sh------- news organization. "Fair and balanced" does not equal "truthful and accurate".

 

I'd believe it was "accidental" if it wasn't always Democrats to Republicans.

Posted
The media sucks. Check.

The Democrats suck. Check.

The Republicans suck. Check.

People who continue to follow both of these parties suck. Check.

 

 

You a very wise man AD. Check. :lol:

Posted
The media sucks. Check.

The Democrats suck. Check.

The Republicans suck. Check.

People who continue to follow both of these parties suck. Check.

 

Check IT. Not "Check". "Check It".

Posted

Anytime somebody does something stupid, it is because of their political affiliation, not because they are stupid........Gotta love America.....

Posted
But you left out a huge propaganda offender - FOX (FAUX) News. Why is that?

 

Are you serious? At this time, Fox is the only news organization holding Obama and the far left in check. Under Bush they were no doubt guilty of being propagandists, but never to the level of the big three today. If it wasn't for them, Obama would have abolished presidential term limits by now.

 

:unsure:

Posted
Are you serious? At this time, Fox is the only news organization holding Obama and the far left in check. Under Bush they were no doubt guilty of being propagandists, but never to the level of the big three today. If it wasn't for them, Obama would have abolished presidential term limits by now.

 

:wallbash:

ok :unsure:

Posted
Someone owes me something for the time I just wasted reading this thread.

Maybe you can get some of the stimulus money!

 

Ok, funny, but not really funny! :unsure:

×
×
  • Create New...