Chandler#81 Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 http://www.wesh.com/cnn-news/20120476/detail.html Peeper put it on the web trying to sell it. Article claims all who clicked the link got a virus. This link Safe for work.
angrygnome Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 http://www.wesh.com/cnn-news/20120476/detail.html Peeper put it on the web trying to sell it. Article claims all who clicked the link got a virus. This link Safe for work. My girlfriend heard about it on the radio on her way to work this morning. She called me and I downloaded it off of another site. It's her, but take my word for it there is no point in watching it.
RayFinkle Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 ...It's her, but take my word for it there is no point in watching it. I'll be the judge of that!!
ricojes Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 There are supposed to be a bunch of viruses attached to these links, so be careful. Also, I can't believe this is the first post regarding this incident. I heard it early this morning and figured there would be multiple posts, maybe it's on the stadium wall, haven't looked there... Link Great line from the link -- "We doubt that will stem the masses from searching, but nevertheless: To all the perverts — you have been warned."
buckeyemike Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 There are supposed to be a bunch of virus's attached to these links, so be careful. Also, I can't believe this is the first post regarding this incident. I heard it early this morning and figured there would be multiple posts, maybe it's on the stadium wall, haven't looked there... I briefly mentioned it in my post about the Bachelorette. IMO, that's all it deserves.
ricojes Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 I briefly mentioned it in my post about the Bachelorette. IMO, that's all it deserves. I agree, but we are in the minority. I don't think anything as creepy and disgusting as this should be publicized. But obviously there is no stopping it, as it's all over the internet and news. So that's why I was surprised at the delay of the post on this board...
inkman Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 Anyone besides angrygnome see the video? I was able to locate it and I was pleasantly surprised. I felt a little wierd about including a link as it seems as if legal ramifications are on the horizon.
DrDawkinstein Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 there was a thread about this on Saturday right as it it the internet. might have been deleted. it was vaguely titled... edit: nope, here it is http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=91830&hl=
/dev/null Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 Much as I'd like to see Erin Andrews in the flesh, this isn't the right way to do so I'll pass. Too disturbing
kegtapr Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 Quite honestly, anyone who searches for and watches this is no better then the person who taped it. It was done without her knowledge. It's not like other celebrity films where they were knowingly taped.
Dwight Drane Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 Quite honestly, anyone who searches for and watches this is no better then the person who taped it. It was done without her knowledge. It's not like other celebrity films where they were knowingly taped. On the relative immorality scale: Taping nude stranger through peephole- 8/10 Taping nude public figure who ascends the ladder due to physical appearance- 6.5/10 Searching for tape on internet- 3/10 Clicking on link in thread brought to attention- 1.5/10
BuffaloBill Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 http://www.wesh.com/cnn-news/20120476/detail.html Peeper put it on the web trying to sell it. Article claims all who clicked the link got a virus. This link Safe for work. Pretty stupid - sick that some ahole would set a camera up - I know it happens - hope the dude gets a long time in a cell as he deserves it. It is one thing if she elects to show herself to the world - much different if she is wrongly exposed by some pervert.
The Big Cat Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 On the relative immorality scale: Taping nude stranger through peephole- 8/10 Taping nude public figure who ascends the ladder due to physical appearance- 6.5/10 Searching for tape on internet- 3/10 Clicking on link in thread brought to attention- 1.5/10 Well, at least I'm only half as morally ambiguous as Erin herself. Nice cans. At first I thought they were fake, but she didn't get the football-in-a-nylon action when she bent over. I'm impressed.
buckeyemike Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 Much as I'd like to see Erin Andrews in the flesh, this isn't the right way to do so I'll pass. Too disturbing And I thought I was the only one who felt this way. I'm not into voyeurism. First of all, it's a crime. Secondly, it isn't right. Miss Andrews strikes me as the type of person I would not want to spend a whole lot of time with, despite her beauty. I've heard stories that she's rather nasty to ESPN staff. But, she does not deserve to be spied on like this.
Wayne Fontes Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 Erin Andrews. Big breasts - check. Clorox yellow hair - check Butterface - check. I don't get the infatuation.
The Big Cat Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 Erin Andrews. Big breasts - check. Clorox yellow hair - check Butterface - check. I don't get the infatuation. I think it has to do with the fact that 60% of men wouldn't get passed #2 before hopping on the "Oh my f-cking God she's so f-cking hot" train.
Phlegm Alley Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 Just a pic for those who don't know her. Definitely not her.
Steely Dan Posted July 21, 2009 Posted July 21, 2009 Ooops! picture is under wrong name on internet site this is her. CBS News discussion on the consequences of these crimes. There are other video's about Erin too.
Recommended Posts