Jump to content

Ellison


Recommended Posts

Better take it easy there, SJBF. Billistic will accuse YOU of being the troll. That's his style. But rest assured, he IS a troll. And he gets less clever about it every day. For instance, in the 'Is McKelvin Going to be a Shutdown CB this Year' thread, in post #53 he actually created a bogus post by me and responded to it.

 

 

[i summarized your post as, "...blah, blah, blah...]

 

"I'm pretty sure that violates a community rule and I'm waiting for a response from the Mods but it goes to show you his complete lack of integrity. When you have to make it appear that someone created a post and then you respond to it, it's pitiful. He might be a bit schizo and short on meds but that's pure conjecture on my part.

 

But you have his style pegged. He doesn't like it when people disagree with him and gets incensed when you call him on any of the BS he spews here.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

Except that I love when others disagree with me.

 

I really, truly hope you invoke the board moderators to examine the case you cite, as well as the posts you made inferring that I was not a heterosexual.

 

to quote you, directly (http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showt...p;#entry1479609):

 

You're either a proctologist or spend way too much time working out to Richard Simmons tapes. I doubt the former because, if your posts on such a simple game as football are any indication, you definately lack the mental accumen necessary to achieve a GED, let alone an MD. So I suspect it's been a life in tight red shorts with Mr. Billistic holding hands on the beach. Not that there's anything wrong with it.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

-and later,

 

And feel free to bring Mr. Billistic, too.

 

...and you talk about integrity?

 

Those there would be a measured, intelligent responses representative of this great, grand group of high minded Bills fans.

 

You people kill me...with laughter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Except that I love when others disagree with me.

 

I really, truly hope you invoke the board moderators to examine the case you cite, as well as the posts you made inferring that I was not a heterosexual.

 

to quote you, directly:

 

 

You people kill me...with laughter.

 

If I may quote you directly. And please note the timeline. In my best sandbox vernacular: "You started it."

 

Yesterday, 09:11 PM Post #49

 

 

Rookie

 

 

Group: Members

Posts: 359

Joined: 7-July 09

Member No.: 11,888

 

 

 

By that paradigm, you are the sphincter at the very posterior end of the alimentary canal, and therefore smooth muscle, Mr. Smoothie.

 

 

Whenever I or anyone else gives you well-reasoned intelligent responses that you don't agree with you get bent out of shape. There are numerous examples over numerous threads. Many of us have given you the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, we all must be wrong. I see you love playing the vicitim as well.

 

And if you can't see the difference between busting chops in retaliation vs. the outright dishonesty in making it look as though someone created a post just so you can respond (to your OWN lying post), what can I say. Should we all have the freedom of just making up posts that can be mistakenly attributed to another poster and then answering them? Do you not see the utter lack of integrity and the negative impact that may have on the community? Like my point about Robert James, you probably don't. So yeah, let the mods do their jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I may quote you directly. And please note the timeline. In my best sandbox vernacular: "You started it."

 

http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showt...p=1479609

 

Whenever I or anyone else gives you well-reasoned intelligent responses that you don't agree with you get bent out of shape. There are numerous examples over numerous threads. Many of us have given you the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, we all must be wrong. I see you love playing the vicitim as well.

 

...and what you've given a link to proves what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'll do with Billistic what we always do with people like him. Go to the control panel and put him on "ignore user" status.

 

If we want to read his nonsense we can click the button but otherwise it just states his name with none of his post visible, rendering him what he's already become...irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'll do with Billistic what we always do with people like him. Go to the control panel and put him on "ignore user" status.

 

If we want to read his nonsense we can click the button but otherwise it just states his name with none of his post visible, rendering him what he's already become...irrelevant.

 

Love the "we". Shouldn't it be "wee"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and what you've given a link to proves what?

 

It was supposed to be a direct link to post #53 in the "Will McKelvn be a Shutdown CB this Year Thread." You know the post quite well. It's the one where you purposely made it look like I created a post to which you make a response. You know as well as I that I didn't create the quoted post you responded to. You did. That's dishonest. A lie. And a great indicator of what you must resort to in order to justify yourself. I've know only one other poster that tried that. You're in good company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was supposed to be a direct link to post #53 in the "Will McKelvn be a Shutdown CB this Year Thread." You know the post quite well. It's the one where you purposely made it look like I created a post to which you make a response. You know as well as I that I didn't create the quoted post you responded to. You did. That's dishonest. A lie. And a great indicator of what you must resort to in order to justify yourself. I've know only one other poster that tried that. You're in good company.

 

No.

 

Summarizing your persiflage with "blah, blah, blah" was quite accurate, and saved numerous otherwise wasted pixels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was supposed to be a direct link to post #53 in the "Will McKelvn be a Shutdown CB this Year Thread." You know the post quite well. It's the one where you purposely made it look like I created a post to which you make a response. You know as well as I that I didn't create the quoted post you responded to. You did. That's dishonest. A lie. And a great indicator of what you must resort to in order to justify yourself. I've know only one other poster that tried that. You're in good company.

 

It's all out there for everybody to see. I am not in any way ashamed of how I hammered your blather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all out there for everybody to see. I am not in any way ashamed of how I hammered your blather.

 

You still don't get it, do you? You're not ashamed of completely fabricating a post made to look like one I originated just so you could respond?

 

It may be out there for everyone to see. But it's a lie. A huge lie. And I don't appreciate it. Nor would any other poster around here. I gave you a chance to be a man about it and remove it on your own accord. You denied. You are not honorable enough to do so. It will be removed and the only thing left to see will be your track record of dishonesty and utter lack of credibility. Glad you can live with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You still don't get it, do you? You're not ashamed of completely fabricating a post made to look like one I originated just so you could respond?

 

It may be out there for everyone to see. But it's a lie. A huge lie. And I don't appreciate it. Nor would any other poster around here. I gave you a chance to be a man about it and remove it on your own accord. You denied. You are not honorable enough to do so. It will be removed and the only thing left to see will be your track record of dishonesty and utter lack of credibility. Glad you can live with that.

 

K9 said (direct quote, for all to see):

 

You're not very quick with metaphors, are you? Small wonder there, cyber muscles.

 

But all this talk of sphincters, posterior ends, and alilmentary canals smacks of too much knowledge in the area. You're either a proctologist or spend way too much time working out to Richard Simmons tapes. I doubt the former because, if your posts on such a simple game as football are any indication, you definately lack the mental accumen necessary to achieve a GED, let alone an MD. So I suspect it's been a life in tight red shorts with Mr. Billistic holding hands on the beach. Not that there's anything wrong with it.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

I replied (intending humor):

 

QUOTE (K-9 @ Jul 19 2009, 09:06 PM) *

...blah, blah, blah......

 

...so kill me, or call the ACLU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'll do with Billistic what we always do with people like him. Go to the control panel and put him on "ignore user" status.

 

If we want to read his nonsense we can click the button but otherwise it just states his name with none of his post visible, rendering him what he's already become...irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'll do with Billistic what we always do with people like him. Go to the control panel and put him on "ignore user" status.

 

If we want to read his nonsense we can click the button but otherwise it just states his name with none of his post visible, rendering him what he's already become...irrelevant.

 

If I'm so irrelevant, what is this hysterical gang bang by you oafs about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

K9 said (direct quote, for all to see):

 

 

 

I replied (intending humor):

 

 

 

...so kill me.

 

Billistic said, nearly a full hour before my above mentioned response to him:

 

By that paradigm, you are the sphincter at the very posterior end of the alimentary canal, and therefore smooth muscle, Mr. Smoothie.

 

Do you wish to continue with this? In EVERY case I can show how you started the digressive pattern of post/response. And not just from me but from several others since you've arrived. I used the word caustic. But that's not a fair description anymore. Not when LIAR is more appropriate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Billistic said, nearly a full hour before my above mentioned response to him:

 

 

 

Do you wish to continue with this? In EVERY case I can show how you started the digressive pattern of post/response. And not just from me but from several others since you've arrived. I used the word caustic. But that's not a fair description anymore. Not when LIAR is more appropriate.

 

 

Why bother with this festering boil?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Billistic said, nearly a full hour before my above mentioned response to him:

 

 

 

Do you wish to continue with this? In EVERY case I can show how you started the digressive pattern of post/response. And not just from me but from several others since you've arrived. I used the word caustic. But that's not a fair description anymore. Not when LIAR is more appropriate.

 

Well, let's see your "show". BTW, what is exactly is a "digressive pattern"? ...and what exactly were the lies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why bother with this festering boil?

 

Because this festering boil (and I'm not sure other festering boils would appreciate the comparison) deliberately created a false post by me and responded to it himself. I don't appreciate that dishonesty around here. Look at post #53 in the "McKelvin...." thread below and you'll see exactly what I mean. He makes it look like I posted something he could respond to. Except I never created that post. What if everybody did that? This place would be a mess. It shouldn't be tolerated. And he's not man enough to delete it.

 

GO BILLS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because this festering boil (and I'm not sure other festering boils would appreciate the comparison) deliberately created a false post by me and responded to it himself. I don't appreciate that dishonesty around here. Look at post #53 in the "McKelvin...." thread below and you'll see exactly what I mean. He makes it look like I posted something he could respond to. Except I never created that post. What if everybody did that? This place would be a mess. It shouldn't be tolerated. And he's not man enough to delete it.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

Post #113 (above) is what he's flipping out over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...