Chandler#81 Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 At the risk of giving props to a 'waller', it's a good analysis of what can be expected. 2 things of note for me; New England needed all 4 victories against the NFC West last year to get 10 wins but still couldn't make the dance in the AFC. I think the Bills pass D is and was better than suggested here, and a better pass rush will make them even stronger. http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nflnation?tag=i...20matchups%2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 At the risk of giving props to a 'waller', it's a good analysis of what can be expected. 2 things of note for me; New England needed all 4 victories against the NFC West last year to get 10 wins but still couldn't make the dance in the AFC. I think the Bills pass D is and was better than suggested here, and a better pass rush will make them even stronger. http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nflnation?tag=i...20matchups%2009 I think the NFC South is the most overrated division in football. The Saints are a very soft team that is suspect on defense and can't consistently run the ball. The Falcons should have a great offense but their defense is weak. The Bucs are a mess right now. And the Panthers should be played like teams used to play the Bills: load up the run, double Smith, and let Delhomme and the other receivers try and beat you. If we are going to be a playoff team, we need to go at least 2-2 and possibly 3-1 against them. I think we match up very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookiemonster Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 At the risk of giving props to a 'waller', it's a good analysis of what can be expected. 2 things of note for me; New England needed all 4 victories against the NFC West last year to get 10 wins but still couldn't make the dance in the AFC. I think the Bills pass D is and was better than suggested here, and a better pass rush will make them even stronger. http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nflnation?tag=i...20matchups%2009 Pretty decent analysis, and I hope that playing some of them early and at home, will make the task a little more manageable. On paper our schedule is pretty tough, but the way it lines up, kinda mitigates the toughness some. 10-6 and Play-Offs baby. BTW, nice post, Chandelier Leg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBlood Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 I found the article below Tims intresting as they only mentioned the Bills once as they trashed our OTs and kept refering to the 3 stout 3-4 Ds in the AFC East (obviously leaving us out) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 At the risk of giving props to a 'waller', it's a good analysis of what can be expected. 2 things of note for me; New England needed all 4 victories against the NFC West last year to get 10 wins but still couldn't make the dance in the AFC. I think the Bills pass D is and was better than suggested here, and a better pass rush will make them even stronger. http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nflnation?tag=i...20matchups%2009 I think everything in there was accurate. The other guy's take on the DE's vs. our OT's worries me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts