Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

¶ in a pissy mood, and it's time to close this sucker of a thread, so i dare anyone to top or, in all reality, bottom this one.

¶ the liquor's flowing, and so are my fingers on this keyboard, and there's one tweeter out there who's taken at least one too many liberties with the "old" adjective that's made this night far too incomplete. old, my ass. 91 or 70 or 40 for that matter. i'm 46, and this baby-faced "twit" seems to think that Jerry Jones and Bob Kraft and every other NFL owner is some naive innocent, capable of calling upon the wisdom of halas.

¶ good god, agism, alive an well in twitland.

¶ and this is not a night to take prisoners or ask questions.

¶ but i digress, and i'm not exactly sure what i'm diverging from, though the point i have might eventually, and hopefully, be as blunt as a triple-xxx porn show at the o'farrell (and for the laymen and women, please, look that reference up before making judgment).

¶ got the jazz butcher banging on the ipod, and several e-mails outstanding, and a vacation on the horizon before heading out to vancouver for a busy stretch of the olympics.

¶ the bills are making midnight moves and it's starting to impair on my drinking time. so i take issue with these ungodly hour press releases. and Lori can attest that.

¶ but on with this red-assed rant, with no real purpose or shame, because it's been a long day spoiled already. it began some 18 hours ago with some Mark from Albany accusing me of being a "Raiders fan," in an e-mail he sent to a Roger Wyland's radio show, and questioned why i'm so hard on the bills. well, if 10 years of mediocrity doesn't turn anyone's crank then god be with the fantasy writers, psychofants and baloney chuckers.

¶ there's not enough lipstick to paste on this pig to ham it up to a status of respectibility. 10 years of missing the playoffs and on pace with detroit lions should be enough to establish a level of skepticism, eh?

¶ please.

¶ i previously wondered what followed z.

¶ well, it's been well established that zed is dead. zed is dead.

¶ jw

Posted
¶ in a pissy mood, and it's time to close this sucker of a thread, so i dare anyone to top or, in all reality, bottom this one.

¶ the liquor's flowing, and so are my fingers on this keyboard, and there's one tweeter out there who's taken at least one too many liberties with the "old" adjective that's made this night far too incomplete. old, my ass. 91 or 70 or 40 for that matter. i'm 46, and this baby-faced "twit" seems to think that Jerry Jones and Bob Kraft and every other NFL owner is some naive innocent, capable of calling upon the wisdom of halas.

¶ good god, agism, alive an well in twitland.

¶ and this is not a night to take prisoners or ask questions.

¶ but i digress, and i'm not exactly sure what i'm diverging from, though the point i have might eventually, and hopefully, be as blunt as a triple-xxx porn show at the o'farrell (and for the laymen and women, please, look that reference up before making judgment).

¶ got the jazz butcher banging on the ipod, and several e-mails outstanding, and a vacation on the horizon before heading out to vancouver for a busy stretch of the olympics.

¶ the bills are making midnight moves and it's starting to impair on my drinking time. so i take issue with these ungodly hour press releases. and Lori can attest that.

¶ but on with this red-assed rant, with no real purpose or shame, because it's been a long day spoiled already. it began some 18 hours ago with some Mark from Albany accusing me of being a "Raiders fan," in an e-mail he sent to a Roger Wyland's radio show, and questioned why i'm so hard on the bills. well, if 10 years of mediocrity doesn't turn anyone's crank then god be with the fantasy writers, psychofants and baloney chuckers.

¶ there's not enough lipstick to paste on this pig to ham it up to a status of respectibility. 10 years of missing the playoffs and on pace with detroit lions should be enough to establish a level of skepticism, eh?

¶ please.

¶ i previously wondered what followed z.

¶ well, it's been well established that zed is dead. zed is dead.

¶ jw

 

You're a Raiders fan? Well there's no way i can let you win this thing...

 

:thumbsup:

Posted
¶ in a pissy mood, and it's time to close this sucker of a thread, so i dare anyone to top or, in all reality, bottom this one.

¶ the liquor's flowing, and so are my fingers on this keyboard, and there's one tweeter out there who's taken at least one too many liberties with the "old" adjective that's made this night far too incomplete. old, my ass. 91 or 70 or 40 for that matter. i'm 46, and this baby-faced "twit" seems to think that Jerry Jones and Bob Kraft and every other NFL owner is some naive innocent, capable of calling upon the wisdom of halas.

¶ good god, agism, alive an well in twitland.

¶ and this is not a night to take prisoners or ask questions.

¶ but i digress, and i'm not exactly sure what i'm diverging from, though the point i have might eventually, and hopefully, be as blunt as a triple-xxx porn show at the o'farrell (and for the laymen and women, please, look that reference up before making judgment).

¶ got the jazz butcher banging on the ipod, and several e-mails outstanding, and a vacation on the horizon before heading out to vancouver for a busy stretch of the olympics.

¶ the bills are making midnight moves and it's starting to impair on my drinking time. so i take issue with these ungodly hour press releases. and Lori can attest that.

¶ but on with this red-assed rant, with no real purpose or shame, because it's been a long day spoiled already. it began some 18 hours ago with some Mark from Albany accusing me of being a "Raiders fan," in an e-mail he sent to a Roger Wyland's radio show, and questioned why i'm so hard on the bills. well, if 10 years of mediocrity doesn't turn anyone's crank then god be with the fantasy writers, psychofants and baloney chuckers.

¶ there's not enough lipstick to paste on this pig to ham it up to a status of respectibility. 10 years of missing the playoffs and on pace with detroit lions should be enough to establish a level of skepticism, eh?

¶ please.

¶ i previously wondered what followed z.

¶ well, it's been well established that zed is dead. zed is dead.

¶ jw

 

 

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz, bibibibbii zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz, bibibibibi :lol:

 

Don't let some Jackass!! in Albany get you down. Who shivs a git? For all of the crap I give you, ummm, errrrr, eeee... I.....ummm, eeeee, errrr.....do feel you are a valued member here. Ok so much for the pity post. We now return you to regularly scheduled smartass. :thumbsup:

 

BTW, I agree my thread is far superior to this one. http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?...cond++last+post I've lifted the no JW posts rule and added Riboflavin. :oops:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...