Sanders has a history of getting the most from d-line

[Beerball]

Lets hope that continues.

 

We watched every sack in the NFL over the past two years this offseason and 90 percent of the sacks in the league are off counter moves,” said Kyle Williams

[H2o]

Lets hope that continues.

+1

[SKOOBY]

Lets hope that continues.

 

+ 2.

[Astrobot]

Let me ask a question. I really don't know the answer. Players get talked to, shown new techniques, and watch film. How much change can this instruction bring about under live fire? It seems to me that thinking is too SLOW to use in real games, and you are left with mere reaction--automatic response. Is that likely to be changed by a d-line coach?

[K-9]

Let me ask a question. I really don't know the answer. Players get talked to, shown new techniques, and watch film. How much change can this instruction bring about under live fire? It seems to me that thinking is too SLOW to use in real games, and you are left with mere reaction--automatic response. Is that likely to be changed by a d-line coach?

 

Good point. And the answer is, "of course not." Kyle Williams sounds like it was a major revelation that 90% of sacks are a result of counter moves. Anyone with just a little more than a cursory knowledge can tell you that without having to look at film. Why weren't our guys being taught more counter moves is beyond me. I'm sure the attempt was made but, while I like the Williams' of the world, they ARE limited in their ability. Aside from Stroud and Schobel there is nobody else that's a legit starter on our line. As a result, I'm not sure that our new DLine coach is gonna make chicken salad out of the same chicken sh*t. That said I do think the following will occur:

 

Maybin WILL bring a speed element that's been lacking. He will surprise with his burst off the snap.

 

McGargo, assuming his injury is behind him, WILL be the most improved player and will benefit the most from a new coach. I get the impression he's matured a bit. That's been his main issue since HS.

 

Schobel WILL return to form and get his usual 10 sacks.

 

GO BILLS!!!

[The Big Cat]

Good point. And the answer is, "of course not." Kyle Williams sounds like it was a major revelation that 90% of sacks are a result of counter moves. Anyone with just a little more than a cursory knowledge can tell you that without having to look at film. Why weren't our guys being taught more counter moves is beyond me. I'm sure the attempt was made but, while I like the Williams' of the world, they ARE limited in their ability. Aside from Stroud and Schobel there is nobody else that's a legit starter on our line. As a result, I'm not sure that our new DLine coach is gonna make chicken salad out of the same chicken sh*t. That said I do think the following will occur:

 

Maybin WILL bring a speed element that's been lacking. He will surprise with his burst off the snap.

 

McGargo, assuming his injury is behind him, WILL be the most improved player and will benefit the most from a new coach. I get the impression he's matured a bit. That's been his main issue since HS.

 

Schobel WILL return to form and get his usual 10 sacks.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

I simply don't understand this "Kyle Williams is not a legitimate starter" mumbo jumbo. The guy has started 43 of the 48 NFL games he's been on a roster for.

[Speedy G]

Let me ask a question. I really don't know the answer. Players get talked to, shown new techniques, and watch film. How much change can this instruction bring about under live fire? It seems to me that thinking is too SLOW to use in real games, and you are left with mere reaction--automatic response. Is that likely to be changed by a d-line coach?

 

 

If his history is any indication of what he can teach, then they should be well versed in counter moves and it should only improve as the season progresses and they get more reps. I see how you can think that the thinking would be too slow, but if the continuous reps and focus on creativity are there, then I can see the D line doing very well, and yes its likely to be changed by a D line coach

[San Jose Bills Fan]

Let me ask a question. I really don't know the answer. Players get talked to, shown new techniques, and watch film. How much change can this instruction bring about under live fire? It seems to me that thinking is too SLOW to use in real games, and you are left with mere reaction--automatic response. Is that likely to be changed by a d-line coach?

It would more likely be changed by a positional coach (ie-defensive line coach) than by a coordinator.

 

And I'm greatly encouraged by Sanders' documented development of Jevon Kearse (who we know is a freakishly athletic player similar to Aaron Maybin) and more recently with Aaron Kampman who Sanders helped develop into a Pro Bowl end after being a 5th round pick.

[K-9]

I simply don't understand this "Kyle Williams is not a legitimate starter" mumbo jumbo. The guy has started 43 of the 48 NFL games he's been on a roster for.

 

Yes, he's a legitimate starter for US. That says more about the level of talent on OUR team than anything else. I'm not convinced he would start on half the teams in the league though. And I like his heart. But he's not that good. We need to have a better compliment to Stroud. I hope he proves me wrong, though.

 

GO BILLS!!!

[The Big Cat]

Yes, he's a legitimate starter for US. That says more about the level of talent on OUR team than anything else. I'm not convinced he would start on half the teams in the league though. And I like his heart. But he's not that good. We need to have a better compliment to Stroud. I hope he proves me wrong, though.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

Yeah but he's not that bad either. If he wasn't a starter he would be one HELL of a back up. They guy is steady, consistent, and rarely, if ever, misses the opportunity to make a play. He doesn't get blown up, he doesn't get pushed around, and he's incredibly stout in the run game, am I missing something? I was under the impression that the DT playing his position wasn't supposed to penetrate. So what, specifically, is he not "that good" at?

[K-9]

Yeah but he's not that bad either. If he wasn't a starter he would be one HELL of a back up. They guy is steady, consistent, and rarely, if ever, misses the opportunity to make a play. He doesn't get blown up, he doesn't get pushed around, and he's incredibly stout in the run game, am I missing something? I was under the impression that the DT playing his position wasn't supposed to penetrate. So what, specifically, is he not "that good" at?

 

I don't disagree with anything you say except that in our system the DTs HAVE to generate a pass rush. Both of them. Williams is steady and stout and all that but he can't push a pocket very well. It's nice when the Bills can subsitute on obvious passing downs but teams don't just pass in obvious situations as you know. Look, I like the guy but nobody would be saddened if we added a Henderson to compliment Stroud now would they. Why? Because then you have two legit DTs that can push the pocket and disrupt timing. While Stroud is getting doubled, Williams is too often flailing away with those short arms of his trying to get to the passer and he's just too short to bat a pass down. I also wonder why they never run stunts with him as well (not quick enough or fast enough I suspect).

 

Love him as a backup though.

 

GO BILLS!!!

[Mr. WEO]

Hopefully he will have more of an impact on the d-line than Colonel Sanders had on our O-line last year.

[Steely Dan]

From the article;

 

The past two defensive line coaches for the Bills were known as yellers. Tim Krumrie and Bill Kollar were highly vocal coaches that tried to get the most out of their players by preaching effort more than x’s and o’s. Buffalo’s new defensive line coach Bob Sanders has a bit of a different approach. He’ll raise his voice when it’s warranted, but his philosophy is strong technique skills win the battles in the trenches and get results.

 

I wonder why that didn't work for Tim Anderson?

 

 

Let me ask a question. I really don't know the answer. Players get talked to, shown new techniques, and watch film. How much change can this instruction bring about under live fire? It seems to me that thinking is too SLOW to use in real games, and you are left with mere reaction--automatic response. Is that likely to be changed by a d-line coach?

 

Sanders doesn't want thinking as much as solid technique. This has nothing to do with a players instincts. This is all about using technique when attacking the OL. Sanders is trying to make the technique second nature for the guys. A lot of these guys already know how to diagnose a play. Play diagnosis is for the meeting rooms.

 

 

Good point. And the answer is, "of course not." Kyle Williams sounds like it was a major revelation that 90% of sacks are a result of counter moves. Anyone with just a little more than a cursory knowledge can tell you that without having to look at film. Why weren't our guys being taught more counter moves is beyond me. I'm sure the attempt was made but, while I like the Williams' of the world, they ARE limited in their ability. Aside from Stroud and Schobel there is nobody else that's a legit starter on our line. As a result, I'm not sure that our new DLine coach is gonna make chicken salad out of the same chicken sh*t. That said I do think the following will occur:

 

Maybin WILL bring a speed element that's been lacking. He will surprise with his burst off the snap.

 

McGargo, assuming his injury is behind him, WILL be the most improved player and will benefit the most from a new coach. I get the impression he's matured a bit. That's been his main issue since HS.

 

Schobel WILL return to form and get his usual 10 sacks.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

I'm not as sure about that as you seem to be. I think you'll be very surprised by how much better the DL gets through solid techniques.

[Steely Dan]

Hopefully he will have more of an impact on the d-line than Colonel Sanders had on our O-line last year.

 

What do you mean by that?

[Dan]

That article, along with the latest video on bb.com, is really eye opening. It sounds as though our defense and offense have been run like a high school team, for years. They're just now learning... “I think the tendency is with everybody in the NFL you have an initial move and a lot of times you get stuck,” said Williams. “And you don’t know where to go from there. And the things that he’s been doing are teaching us how to have those answers if our initial move is neutralized.” ??

 

The Offense is just now learning how to change plays at the line and that it's hard to process all this information in a few seconds?

 

My first reaction, quite honestly, isn't one of enthusiasm for the upcoming season. It's one of disgust and amazement. How can a DT that's been starting for 3 years not realize that he needs to have something after his initial move? Or Edwards is just now being able to change the plays at the line? Isn't this stuff that every team in the league does? It's no wonder we've looked so inept and bland for 3 years. How can they ever expect to win consistently when the opposing team recognizes the play or defensive set and audiblizes - and we do nothing in return?

 

So basically, our team has been coached to go out there and try hard. And that's about it. Is it just me; am I wrong in my take from those 2 pieces?

[John from Riverside]

Let me ask a question. I really don't know the answer. Players get talked to, shown new techniques, and watch film. How much change can this instruction bring about under live fire? It seems to me that thinking is too SLOW to use in real games, and you are left with mere reaction--automatic response. Is that likely to be changed by a d-line coach?

 

In my opinion as a former player, coach, and watching my son get coached on D line it really is all about fit and temperment.......

 

Just to give you a for instance on a much lower level....I coached JAAF football as the D line coach for a couple of years and the coaches of a particular group tend to stay togehter all the way up through the different age groups. A D line coached moved away at the last minute and I was asked to step in (the HC said he wasn't that good of a coach anyway but he was a friend so nothing was said)

 

In my first month of practices I noticed that when a D Line player would make a mistake their head would immediately go down and they would cringe.......waiting for the yelling to come. Then when it didn't the player would look up at me and I would say "run it again".....if the same mistake was made I would pull the player insert another kid for a couple of series and privately QUIETLY talk to them on the sideline about the assignment......find out what was going on.......explain what the player needed to do......explain why he needed to do it.....then reinsert the player. I was also very big on "film session time" at my house that involved practice and game film, my big screen TV, and pizza. It was not a B word session but a time to see how things were actually playing out and to give input both ways.....sometimes it was discovered that a player was a bad fit at one position and a better one at another.....another thing I did was make it understood that NOBODY was safe at their spots......if I decided that someone wasn't cutting it after giving them their shot and somebody behind them was playing better.......then there were going to be battles for the positions.

 

Things went on like this for a while.......the D line play picked up big time (and I was told by the leaving D line coach that I had my work cut out for me because this was a "soft" bunch) we made the playoffs every year I coached (my diebetes started getting the better of me and I had to stop) and I had several players make the all league team.

 

As it turns out....the last coach was just not a good fit for the team......a yeller and a screamer who didnt take the time out to teach and explain why things needed to be done a certain way......never listened to his players and actually punished them if they had something to say and NEVER went the extra mile to spend time with them and get to know them like with extra film sessions. He also never gave explanations on playing time to his players and usually went with the same ones except for injury.....he didn't want to spend the time to make sure he was putting his best talent out on the field (and sometimes depending on the strength of another team you have to know when to give some players a blow and play others) if you have a team that is run dominant.....then your players that play run best should be playing....if you have a hotshot young QB going against you.....you need guys who can get pressure into the backfield. In the end it all works out because everybody thinks they are a part of the team.

 

Now....keep in mind that this is on a much lower level.......but when coaches figure out how to reach their players the production picked up......it happened with my son this past year and his new Defensive coach to......he was playing well last year but this year they were calling the house when they found out he couldn't make it to a big passing tourny this weekend because he was going to a D linemen academy camp. THAT IS what reaches my son....coaches caring whethe or not he is actually there and making him know he is an important part of the team.

 

I am hoping that this can be a turnaround year for Jon Mccargo as well.

[BuffaloBill]

Let me ask a question. I really don't know the answer. Players get talked to, shown new techniques, and watch film. How much change can this instruction bring about under live fire? It seems to me that thinking is too SLOW to use in real games, and you are left with mere reaction--automatic response. Is that likely to be changed by a d-line coach?

 

 

Technique and repetition. Do you play golf? Not much different than trying to change your swing - a golf coach teaches you drills to cause your muscles and your mind to come into synch. You are right that if you are thinking about it then you are likely less effective. However that is what practice is for.

[The Big Cat]

In my opinion as a former player, coach, and watching my son get coached on D line it really is all about fit and temperment.......

 

As usual John, I'm grateful for your contributions.

 

I graduated a AAAA high school with 9 varsity letters: 4 in water polo, 3 in baseball, and 2 in basketball. I played D-1 water polo in college. I've had good coaches, I've had bad coaches.

 

I'm currently involved with what I consider the ultimate team pursuit in long-form improvised comedy in Chicago (not a physical venture, granted, but trust me when I say "team" is at a premium). But, part of doing this in Chicago means I'm surrounded by world-class talent, and I'm being taught/coached by world-class minds.

 

My girlfriend/bestfriend (cheesy, I know, but she's a true jock, and a hot one at that, so y'all should be jealous ) currently studies sports psychology and is working with the coaches development academy for US Soccer.

 

My father is very active in the Erie FCA, and they do a ton of work with local high school coaches.

 

What do all these things have in common? None of these experiences/associations have even remotely suggested that a coach that yells at and belittles his players wields even a fraction of the efficacy over his players as one who takes the time to teach, explain, and take into consideration his players' psyche/ego.

 

Now, I know through all of this, the one thing missing from the equation is "football." But people are people, and to take it a step further, MILLENNIALS, like me, like your son, and like almost all of the Buffalo Bills, simply don't respond to mindless brouhaha.

 

We'll just have to see what happens.

[Fingon]

Let me ask a question. I really don't know the answer. Players get talked to, shown new techniques, and watch film. How much change can this instruction bring about under live fire? It seems to me that thinking is too SLOW to use in real games, and you are left with mere reaction--automatic response. Is that likely to be changed by a d-line coach?

Yeah, and martial arts are useless in a fight.

 

 

[offde-fence]

I've loved the pickup of Sanders since it was made. His experience is a bonus. The more different kinds of teaching these guys of ours get, the better they'll be. I also like his martial arts slant - other teams have done it; it certainly couldn't hurt. That mentality that you do anything creative you can come up with to improve the players chances is a fresh attitude to see. I also like what he did with Kampman. Kampman is a like A.S. for us, in body type and skill set, and he already has had probowl years. If he can get better, that would be one helluva an end. And then there is Maybin, who is much like Kearse in body type and athletic ability. Sanders coached him into a monster end. All these things bode well for the Bills D-line.