/dev/null Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/foot...l.ap/index.html
DIE HARD 1967 Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 That first rule must have been changed to help J.P. Losman (lol)
RLflutie7 Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/foot...l.ap/index.html I wish they would eliminate FGs. You'd have a better brand of football. I wish them well. This is like a trial year with only a few teams. But to get people excited, I think they need many more teams. People are not going go watch if they don't have a team in their town. The USFL was strongest when they expanded during the 1984 season. Many FB fans don't think so, but after the XFL's TV ratings, I think you need more teams in the bigger markets. The newUSFL is also going to start play next spring. They've toned down their website a little and I think they're going to wait and see what happens with the UFL. I guess they're going to bring back some of the old USFL team names and logos.
Albany,n.y. Posted July 9, 2009 Posted July 9, 2009 quarterbacks under duress to ground the ball inside or outside the pocket So now when JP gets sacked & fumbles, he'll say "I was just grounding the ball" to the ref.
Ennjay Posted July 9, 2009 Posted July 9, 2009 With the TV-friendly changes (QB/coach on tape delay, halftime video from the locker rooms . . .), I'm wondering: does anyone know who has the TV rights? If it's Versus they can just fold the league right now.
PromoTheRobot Posted July 9, 2009 Posted July 9, 2009 With the TV-friendly changes (QB/coach on tape delay, halftime video from the locker rooms . . .), I'm wondering: does anyone know who has the TV rights? If it's Versus they can just fold the league right now. It is Versus. PTR
Arkady Renko Posted July 10, 2009 Posted July 10, 2009 They don't even have names for the teams. How can they get their act together in time for a season this fall?
Recommended Posts