RuntheDamnBall Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 Noticed Coy Wire didn't even make the active roster, a sure sign he is on his way out. But what of Tim Anderson? A third-rounder and he can't even make active backup on game day? I know we're deep at DT but regardless, all we heard about was how this guy was going to be a world-beater and was having a great camp. Now what? That said, I was very happy with yesterday's game. Don't get me wrong.
nodnarb Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 jeezuz. he's a rookie and he'd have to crack a healthy, experienced 4 man rotation at DT. I'm glad he hasn't seen the field yet. Our DTs are doing a fantastic job.
theesir Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 Noticed Coy Wire didn't even make the active roster, a sure sign he is on his way out. But what of Tim Anderson? A third-rounder and he can't even make active backup on game day? I know we're deep at DT but regardless, all we heard about was how this guy was going to be a world-beater and was having a great camp. Now what? That said, I was very happy with yesterday's game. Don't get me wrong. 107392[/snapback] Coy Wire was injured/inactive
CosmicBills Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 The depletion at the WR and CB positions certainly factored into the decision to keep Anderson inactive on Sunday. He just has fallen victim to a numbers game. Nothing to read into there in my opinion.
RuntheDamnBall Posted November 8, 2004 Author Posted November 8, 2004 jeezuz. he's a rookie and he'd have to crack a healthy, experienced 4 man rotation at DT. I'm glad he hasn't seen the field yet. Our DTs are doing a fantastic job. 107394[/snapback] No, I agree. Perhaps it's more a comment on how Bannan has improved his play and Edwards is really back from injury rather than Anderson's progress. It just seemed like hopes for Anderson were a little exaggerated post-draft / preseason.
Kelly the Dog Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 All it really came down to is that Bannan was going to be used on some OL formations and Edwards as been playing very well lately so there was no way they were going to have five DTs active for this game. Wire was out because he was hurt and will be back without question when he is not hurt.
TigerJ Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 Maybe when Bannan moves to offensive guard next season, Andreson will be a regular in the rotation. LOL Actually I wouldn't rule it out completely.
stuckincincy Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 Because of injuries, the team was short at OL, WR and CB. Not DL. So extra DL's don't suit up.
Guest joefergy Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 No Wire=wins. Wow, how simple is that? 107429[/snapback] Idiot! no Troy Vincent = wins lets get rid of him to! I see Reese and McGee get beat every week to lets get rid of them too! ALL D-backs get beat from time to time. I think we have a great D which is only going to get better. Oh yeah lets cut Kelsey to he sucks to, What are we top 10 in sacks? I have to stop now my blood pressure is going up.......................Idiot!
Recommended Posts