Steely Dan Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Linky Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents Posted Jun 30th 2009 12:00PM by TMZ Staff We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb. Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie's eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris. In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we're told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the "receiving parent" -- Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael. We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were. Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it's not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there's a presumption that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence. We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it's still an open issue with the courts. UH-OH!! Did he forget to adopt them kids!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 "Prince Michael II". That just slays me. How utterly !@#$ing whacked in the head do you have to name your kid that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 "Prince Michael II". That just slays me. How utterly !@#$ing whacked in the head do you have to name your kid that? As much as MJ was and that's a lot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 somehow there is no news involving michael jackson that shocks me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 "Prince Michael II". That just slays me. How utterly !@#$ing whacked in the head do you have to name your kid that? You are forgetting THE Prince...aka Prince Rogers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 "Prince Michael II". That just slays me. How utterly !@#$ing whacked in the head do you have to name your kid that? Not quite as whacked as you would have to be to name your child this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 "Prince Michael II". That just slays me. How utterly !@#$ing whacked in the head do you have to name your kid that? Probably not as whacked as Nic Cage naming his son "Kal-El", or Gwyneth Paltrow naming her daughter "Apple". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Rob Morrow (lead actor on a CBS show) named his daughter "Tu" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 Not quite as whacked as you would have to be to name your child this. That beats Prince Michael for weirdness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 That beats Prince Michael for weirdness. Then again, weirdness obviously runs in that family. No wonder they (allegedly) didn't use his DNA to make the kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special K Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 That beats Prince Michael for weirdness. Bear Grylls of Man vs. Wild named his last two sons Marmaduke and Huckleberry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 Bear Grylls of Man vs. Wild named his last two sons Marmaduke and Huckleberry. Jermajesty Jackson beats 'em all so far. JMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Quint Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 This makes me feel better that Jacko's DNA was cut off. Some people just shouldn't procreate for the good of humanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Is anybody actually surprised that "the kid is not my son?" They have blonde hair. When the dust settles, Michael will be remembered as one of the most screwed up individuals who ever lived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marv's Neighbor Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 That beats Prince Michael for weirdness. Didn't Frank Zappa have; MoonUnit & Dweezle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 I have an announcement: I'm the biological father. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 Is anybody actually surprised that "the kid is not my son?" They have blonde hair. When the dust settles, Michael will be remembered as one of the most screwed up individuals who ever lived. YA THINK!! Didn't Frank Zappa have; MoonUnit & Dweezle? I'm still going with Jermajesty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 I'm still going with Jermajesty. I have a good friend who is a real goof. Used to do stand up but is one of those guys who you never believe no matter what he says. He's the one that told me about that and I just knew he was bullshiiting me. Well I looked it up one day and there it was; Jermajesty Jackson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly McButterpants Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 "Prince Michael II". That just slays me. How utterly !@#$ing whacked in the head do you have to name your kid that? Didn't George Foreman name all of his kids George Foreman the XX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WellDressed Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 Is anybody actually surprised that "the kid is not my son?" They have blonde hair. When the dust settles, Michael will be remembered as one of the most screwed up individuals who ever lived. Hey, wahts pu Billy Jean?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts