Chef Jim Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 Not sure how hard Pot is to quit... I will tell you quitting cigarettes sucked and was the toughest thing I ever had to do. I still like the smell of them occasionally, but I don't have another quit in me... not worth it to do again. Of the three cigarettes is the hardest.
AlaskaDarin_Has_AIDS Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 CHECK IT You have a spelling error in this thread's title-you left out an "O" and a "M". LMAO CHECK IT I knew this joke would go over everyone's head.
Alaska Darin Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 Pot's already "criminalized." Now go find in this thread were I gave a personal opinion on whether it should remain illegal or not and then report back. See you never. And why exactly is that? Hint: It has nothing to do with people using it as a drug. You already asked that. Not answering. Because youre either really dumb or trying to bait me into flipping out with a full-blown flame war, so you can issue me one of your "mod warnings" again. Go fish somewhere else, Ahab. Actually, he's trying to get you to engage your brain for a change.
Alaska Darin Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 Sorry to go knuckle dragger on you guys, but Simon is wrong. I think both Pot and alcohol should be made illegal. Both cause to much damage to individuals and families. One is more violent, but both are degrading to the human experience. Yeah, we should go back to Prohibition. That worked really well.
X. Benedict Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 Sorry to go knuckle dragger on you guys, but Simon is wrong. I think both Pot and alcohol should be made illegal. Both cause to much damage to individuals and families. One is more violent, but both are degrading to the human experience. A champagne wedding toast degrades the human experience?....or a big Zinfandel paired with a porterhouse?......or a beer with buddies after work?...... Granted there are people and personalities that should never drink.....but that sounds pretty categorical.
Chef Jim Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 Granted there are people and personalities that should never drink You're referring to the Irish right?
X. Benedict Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 You're referring to the Irish right? Not exactly. All Irish should drink and then quit. There's a need to belong.
DC Tom Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 A champagne wedding toast degrades the human experience? It's a gateway occasion.
DC Tom Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 Not exactly. All Irish should drink and then quit. There's a need to belong. "We drink and we fight and we drink and we die. We drink and we die and continue to drink."
X. Benedict Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 "We drink and we fight and we drink and we die. We drink and we die and continue to drink." We drink and we sing and we drink and we sing, hey! We drink and we drive and we puke and we drink, hey! We drink and we fight and we bleed and we cry, hey! We puke and we smoke and we drink and we die, hey!
Hollywood Donahoe Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 Anyone can get pot...If he put his mind to it, even BF could figure it out. But it would take him an hour to figure out how to smoke it.
Bill from NYC Posted July 4, 2009 Posted July 4, 2009 Better justification? How about this? Or this? Unless of course you're one of those typical self-professed conservatives who blather on about individual liberties but only really support personal freedoms for people who are exactly like you. Two way street my dear friend. How would you feel about marijuana bars?
ieatcrayonz Posted July 4, 2009 Posted July 4, 2009 How would you feel about marijuana bars? Would they have to adhere to the no smoking in bars ban?
/dev/null Posted July 4, 2009 Posted July 4, 2009 Would they have to adhere to the no smoking in bars ban? If it's medicinal mary-j, it would have to be allowed under the American's With Disabilities Act
Magox Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 I don't know if any of you guys caught what Greenspan said yesterday but.... http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35491.html Greenspan also took pointed shots at Congress, saying that there was "remarkable" pressure on the Fed to enhance lending. He said there was "a lot of amnesia" emerging from Capitol Hill among lawmakers calling for stricter regulation. There was "fairly broad consensus" that increased home ownership was a positive trend. In other words, he blames the libs.
GG Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 I don't know if any of you guys caught what Greenspan said yesterday but.... http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35491.html In other words, he blames the libs. No he didn't. He blamed the same Congresisonal committee that between 2001 & 2006 was screaming at him to keep lending up and ignore what was happening at Fan Fred.
Magox Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 No he didn't. He blamed the same Congresisonal committee that between 2001 & 2006 was screaming at him to keep lending up and ignore what was happening at Fan Fred. Sure he did. It was mainly liberal lawmakers that pushed for housing availability to lower income earners. Right?
DC Tom Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Sure he did. It was mainly liberal lawmakers that pushed for housing availability to lower income earners. Right? Both parties have been doing that for most of our lifetime.
Magox Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Both parties have been doing that for most of our lifetime. Yes, but I did say mainly.
.thumb.jpg.529869a0a9afd197241cad0932282c97.jpg)
Recommended Posts