nuklz2594 Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Stallworth, Vick, Leonard Little? Little is the man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glass To The Arson Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Dungy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 This guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PushthePile Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Vick hands down. I believe the punishment for the other two should have been more severe than Vicks but Ron Mexico is the bigger sack of dung. He knowingly comitted his violent crimes and did it repeatedly. The sick thing is he did what he did to these dogs for no reason, other than showing off and hurting something. The other two made a mistake that most here could have made at some point of their life. They deserve what they got and more but I can't honestly say that either one of them are a POS. It would make me a hypocrite if I did. Although, Little did something else to make his situation worse I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 This guy. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayzer32 Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Rae Carruth gets my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Rae Carruth gets my vote. Exactly .... gunning down a pregnant woman takes the cake...easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WellDressed Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Exactly .... gunning down a pregnant woman takes the cake...easily. while sippin gin n juice in the hood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Stallworth is no bigger a sack of dung that anyone who has ever driven drunk. (half this board) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Rae Carruth gets my vote. I'll third that one. He should never get out of prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Stallworth is no bigger a sack of dung that anyone who has ever driven drunk. (half this board) Guilty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Stallworth is no bigger a sack of dung that anyone who has ever driven drunk. (half this board) Truth. Let he without sin cast the first stone. However, I've never visciously murdered dogs or a pregnant woman so I'm going to go ahead and throw stones at Vick and Carruth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 So how does Michael Vick get 1 year in prison for killing dogs, and Donte Stallworth gets 1 month in prison for killing a human being? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 So how does Michael Vick get 1 year in prison for killing dogs, and Donte Stallworth gets 1 month in prison for killing a human being? Intent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Stallworth is no bigger a sack of dung that anyone who has ever driven drunk. (half this board) Dead on. It's completely missed up, but the only difference between Stallworth, Lynch, & the majority of the board, is Stallworth was very unlucky. I know have been guilty of being really dumb in the past. Luckily, I've never been in Stallworth position because I don't know I'd live with myself. It's also because of stories like Stallworth that people finally get the picture of how dumb drunk driving is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Dead on. It's completely missed up, but the only difference between Stallworth, Lynch, & the majority of the board, is Stallworth was very unlucky. I know have been guilty of being really dumb in the past. Luckily, I've never been in Stallworth position because I don't know I'd live with myself. It's also because of stories like Stallworth that people finally get the picture of how dumb drunk driving is. I drove drunk once in my life (not wasted, mind you, but drunk nonetheless)...When I woke up the next morning, I was so terrified of what I could have done that I'll never even consider doing it again. Stallworth wasn't so lucky. He deserves everything he gets and more, but I still empathize with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 Stallworth, Vick, Leonard Little?Little is the man. Vick. His crimes were premeditated and intentional. In fact, he did it for kicks. Little is a close second because he actually killed someone, which was not totally unforseen considering his repeated drunk driving. Stallworth? I have some sympathy for him (spot on Fingon), though he has certainly earned his prison sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 Intent So then how does the average man get 5 years in prison for the same exact crime, yet Stallworth gets 24 days? Why the discrepancy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 So then how does the average man get 5 years in prison for the same exact crime, yet Stallworth gets 24 days? Why the discrepancy? Well, intent plays a big part. That, and the fact that the prosecution had a pretty weak case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 ? ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts