Beerball Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 We're just as eager as you are, Trent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGimp Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 stopping talking about it and do it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOBILLS78 Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 That "posted by" is so misleading. I was reading the thing thinking, "I haven't been in Buffalo in a while, but is Wawrow not working this beat anymore?" Then I realized it is Wawrow's story and the person who posted it on the Web has a wannabe byline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 stopping talking about it and do it I believe they have to wait for the season to start, but I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 It seems like this team is chock full of guys at important positions with the right attitude...time to make it count on the field! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 Do it for Dakota Trent, Do it for Dakota!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 That "posted by" is so misleading. I was reading the thing thinking, "I haven't been in Buffalo in a while, but is Wawrow not working this beat anymore?" Then I realized it is Wawrow's story and the person who posted it on the Web has a wannabe byline. I was just about to rip the hell out of that myself. If you're going to put ANYTHING there, it should be a byline. Add: in fact, here's an alternate link with the correct byline. http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story...?storyID=808191 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bourbonboy Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 Good to hear Walkers quote about Trent's smarts and picking things up fast - this bodes well for all the no-huddle talk and PFW's blurb yesterday: — After failing to institute many new features in 2008, Bills offensive coordinator Turk Schonert is making a concerted effort to broaden the offensive system during OTAs. He’s incorporating more audibles and is entrusting Trent Edwards with more responsibilities and options as the quarterback comes to the line. http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/The+W...9/afc060709.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delete This Account Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 That "posted by" is so misleading. I was reading the thing thinking, "I haven't been in Buffalo in a while, but is Wawrow not working this beat anymore?" Then I realized it is Wawrow's story and the person who posted it on the Web has a wannabe byline. i'm still here. i kid benigni about that "posted by ..." stuff all the time: `i spend 2 hours writing something up and it takes you 30 seconds to post it.' it's no biggie, and it's an AP member or subscriber's right to do so. but always glad to be recognized. ... though this might explain how erynthered missed me ... Please dont take this wrong, and I'm not being sarcastic. I've never heard of you. I did google you, though. Read a few things. Hell you may have found a fan, not sure yet. I'll let you know. I hope you understand. etr jw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted June 8, 2009 Author Share Posted June 8, 2009 I was just about to rip the hell out of that myself. If you're going to put ANYTHING there, it should be a byline. Add: in fact, here's an alternate link with the correct byline. http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story...?storyID=808191 Damn SKOOBS are everywhere! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 Link We can only hope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 i'm still here. i kid benigni about that "posted by ..." stuff all the time: `i spend 2 hours writing something up and it takes you 30 seconds to post it.'it's no biggie, and it's an AP member or subscriber's right to do so. but always glad to be recognized. ... though this might explain how erynthered missed me ... jw Uh-oh. You mean I shouldn't have fired off that angry e-mail to WKBW? Actually, I did send them one. I realize they're entitled to pull your name off it, but I think the way they're presenting that story could lead people to believe that the guy who posted it actually wrote it. Received a quick response from PD John Di Sciullo, saying that in future, they'll leave the AP writer's name in place when they post something. So, a tip of the hat to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delete This Account Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 Uh-oh. You mean I shouldn't have fired off that angry e-mail to WKBW? Actually, I did send them one. I realize they're entitled to pull your name off it, but I think the way they're presenting that story could lead people to believe that the guy who posted it actually wrote it. Received a quick response from PD John Di Sciullo, saying that in future, they'll leave the AP writer's name in place when they post something. So, a tip of the hat to him. wow, the power of this board never ceases to impress nor amaze me. thanks, Lori. and thanks John Di Sciullo, though, let me stress i had nothing to do with it. i suddenly have supporters. jw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOBILLS78 Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Uh-oh. You mean I shouldn't have fired off that angry e-mail to WKBW? Actually, I did send them one. I realize they're entitled to pull your name off it, but I think the way they're presenting that story could lead people to believe that the guy who posted it actually wrote it. Received a quick response from PD John Di Sciullo, saying that in future, they'll leave the AP writer's name in place when they post something. So, a tip of the hat to him. Wow, nice work. Credit where credit is due -- all around! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Di Sciullo's always been quick to respond when I asked a question about their Bills programming (whenever I get ready to update the radio/TV thread, for example). And I didn't rant; merely pointed out that "in my opinion, it's bad form to put a 'posted by' cite at the top of a story in place of a byline for the guy who actually wrote the piece. It would be simple to look at the top of the story at that link and mistakenly believe that Joe Maxfield, not John Wawrow, was the author." Again, I appreciate his reaction. (However, I cannot confirm whether or not he typed his reply while rolling his eyes and mumbling about that nutty <bleep> at the Bills message board ... ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Uh-oh. You mean I shouldn't have fired off that angry e-mail to WKBW? Troublemaker. Actually, I did send them one. I realize they're entitled to pull your name off it, but I think the way they're presenting that story could lead people to believe that the guy who posted it actually wrote it. Received a quick response from PD John Di Sciullo, saying that in future, they'll leave the AP writer's name in place when they post something. So, a tip of the hat to him. Good for you. Authors should get credit for their work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Di Sciullo's always been quick to respond when I asked a question about their Bills programming (whenever I get ready to update the radio/TV thread, for example). And I didn't rant; merely pointed out that "in my opinion, it's bad form to put a 'posted by' cite at the top of a story in place of a byline for the guy who actually wrote the piece. It would be simple to look at the top of the story at that link and mistakenly believe that Joe Maxfield, not John Wawrow, was the author." Again, I appreciate his reaction. (However, I cannot confirm whether or not he typed his reply while rolling his eyes and mumbling about that nutty <bleep> at the Bills message board ... ) Possible new handle. Lori?? I share KRC's belief about credit due, and you're a champion to that cause, <bleep>! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts