col_forbin Posted November 7, 2004 Posted November 7, 2004 It just seems to me that we shouldn't be running WM 35+ times a game.
BigB7184 Posted November 7, 2004 Posted November 7, 2004 especially when were just running the clock out, put henry in. hes not that bad is he?
col_forbin Posted November 7, 2004 Author Posted November 7, 2004 Really I agree, I think you are just inviting problems. Still glad we won.
Fezmid Posted November 7, 2004 Posted November 7, 2004 So people complain when we don't run the ball enough. Now they complain because we run 41 times. Uh huh... CW
col_forbin Posted November 7, 2004 Author Posted November 7, 2004 Not complaining we run to much, I just think we should let TH carry some of that load at the end.
meazza Posted November 7, 2004 Posted November 7, 2004 So people complain when we don't run the ball enough. Now they complain because we run 41 times. Uh huh... CW 106117[/snapback] its not a complaint its just to keep him for the stretch meaning we have a good enough backup (who doesnt wanna be a backup) to maybe try and prove why he should even play, but i dont know it could be a risk as ive lost a lot of faith in henry
Spiderweb Posted November 7, 2004 Posted November 7, 2004 At least McGahee, there doesn't seem to be anywhere near the fear that he'll put the ball on the carpet... I do agree that we need to not "overuse" McGahee. 37 carries ias about 7-12 too many in my book. It's just hard not to go to a guy who has the potential for a big gain any time he touches the ball. He sure looks like he's on the verge of a long score at any time now....
KurtGodel77 Posted November 7, 2004 Posted November 7, 2004 37 carries is absolutely ridiculous. McGahee is better than Travis, but if you want McGahee to be fresh down the stretch, you have to give Travis some of those carries. No running back can maintain the same level of play as the year wears on if you give him the ball 37 times a game.
Brandon Posted November 7, 2004 Posted November 7, 2004 While I don't think its a problem in the course of a two or three game stretch, the Bills need to make sure they moderate his carries as the season goes on. I'd like to see him average 20-25 the rest of the way, which, in reality, is still a lot of carries.
Chilly Posted November 7, 2004 Posted November 7, 2004 Enjoy the freaking win, and enjoy that we played SMASHMOUTH football successfully and mixed it up with passing plays, finally executing Mularkey's offense the way HE WANTED. Oh and guess what, it produced a dominating win if it wasn't for McGee falling down. Be happy, enjoy it, and realize that this team might (might being the key word here) be coming together the way Mularkey envisioned it.
Campy Posted November 7, 2004 Posted November 7, 2004 Whippee. The Bills won. Let's all find something to piss and moan about...
Fezmid Posted November 7, 2004 Posted November 7, 2004 Whippee. The Bills won. Let's all find something to piss and moan about... 106342[/snapback] Exactly Campy. You shouldn't have changed your sig from last week. *sigh* CW
Recommended Posts