/dev/null Posted May 25, 2009 Posted May 25, 2009 http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/articl...8zY1agD98DCUQ01 Maybe Dave Chapelle knew something we didn't
DC Tom Posted May 25, 2009 Posted May 25, 2009 0.4 micrograms per liter?? Considering the average user needs about a mg per kg of body weight snorted to get high, for the same effect I personally would need to drink...about 100,000 cans of Red Bull. When 150 cans contains enough caffeine to kill an average person. Hooray for product safety!
Tcali Posted May 26, 2009 Posted May 26, 2009 0.4 micrograms per liter?? yeah cute headline--but meaningless---as most headlines are.There is probably more fecal matter in a can of red bull than there is cocaine. Now I wonder how much cocaine was in the old coca cola;)???-nudge nudge wink wink say no more... -No wonder coke became the most popular drink in the world.
bbb Posted May 26, 2009 Posted May 26, 2009 Now what is that they put in Tim Horton's coffee that makes that so addicting??
Arkady Renko Posted May 26, 2009 Posted May 26, 2009 Isn't this different than the standard Red Bull anyway?
Ramius Posted May 26, 2009 Posted May 26, 2009 Just for reference, we're talking about something the size of a grain of salt dissolved into a liter of liquid.
Recommended Posts