swede316 Posted November 5, 2004 Posted November 5, 2004 On the front page of foxnews there is a picture of a marine on patrol without a clip in his rifle..WTF? http://www.foxnews.com/
theesir Posted November 5, 2004 Posted November 5, 2004 He's has his one bullet in his pocket and can put it in the gun when Andy says its OK.
OGTEleven Posted November 6, 2004 Posted November 6, 2004 On the front page of foxnews there is a picture of a marine on patrol without a clip in his rifle..WTF? http://www.foxnews.com/ 104026[/snapback] I saw some film yesterday that indicated they were in training for the battle. That's probably why.
swede316 Posted November 6, 2004 Author Posted November 6, 2004 God I hope...Even as a squid on Security Force..I had a loaded weapon. ...
Campy Posted November 6, 2004 Posted November 6, 2004 God I hope...Even as a squid on Security Force..I had a loaded weapon. ... 104344[/snapback] When my brother was an active duty Jarhead he carried live rounds while securing the nukes at Charleston, His buddy, a friend of the family, was not allowed to carry live rounds when he was guarding the Marine Corps barracks in Beirut in '83. Go figure.
erynthered Posted November 6, 2004 Posted November 6, 2004 Dammit...I missed my 1000 post. 104345[/snapback] Forgot your 1000th clip? Either way, glad your here.
swede316 Posted November 6, 2004 Author Posted November 6, 2004 Forgot your 1000th clip? tongue.gif Either way, glad your here. biggrin.gif Thanks...Well Did I fire 6 shots or only 5..well punk?
VABills Posted November 6, 2004 Posted November 6, 2004 Yeah, to be honest I think he is a support REMF, who was asked to show off for the cameras. I mean he's go the useless scope on an m-16, no grenade, no compass, no kbar.
swede316 Posted November 6, 2004 Author Posted November 6, 2004 When my brother was an active duty Jarhead he carried live rounds while securing the nukes at Charleston, His buddy, a friend of the family, was not allowed to carry live rounds when he was guarding the Marine Corps barracks in Beirut in '83. Go figure. I remember guarding classified info and our use of deadly force policy...Nukes are a shoot first and ask questions later type thing...and I know things have changed at the embassies...Unfortunatly becuase of Bierut.
erynthered Posted November 6, 2004 Posted November 6, 2004 Thanks...Well Did I fire 6 shots or only 5..well punk? 104374[/snapback] Great movie, I gotsta know?
Pete Posted November 6, 2004 Posted November 6, 2004 Great movie, I gotsta know? 104385[/snapback] I's gotsta know I love Clint films! Paint the whole town red? Even the Church? Especially the Church
erynthered Posted November 6, 2004 Posted November 6, 2004 I's gotsta know I love Clint films! Paint the whole town red? Even the Church? Especially the Church 104388[/snapback] Ah, you're right, I !@#$ up the ebonics. Silly me.
VABills Posted November 6, 2004 Posted November 6, 2004 Oh look, more proof. although this guy has that useless scope as well. Notice the nice dirty flak jacket and cammies. http://www.foxnews.com/images/143576/5_22_...aq_fallujah.jpg And for those of you supporting those Army folks about going on their little supply run without armored gas trucks, here is what the real service does when they don't have an armored vehicle. They improvise. They use sandbags. They don't say no. http://www.foxnews.com/photo_essay/photoes...4_fallujah3.jpg
swede316 Posted November 6, 2004 Author Posted November 6, 2004 Never said the scope or (looks to me like a holo sight was useless)but if they say jarhead is on patrol...the mofo best have a 30 round clip and be ready for bear.
VABills Posted November 6, 2004 Posted November 6, 2004 Never said the scope or (looks to me like a holo sight was useless)but if they say jarhead is on patrol...the mofo best have a 30 round clip and be ready for bear. 104397[/snapback] I agree. The original picture, the guy was not out. Not sure what he did.
swede316 Posted November 6, 2004 Author Posted November 6, 2004 Whatever the point I was trying to make..It's moot now....stevestojan is about to get serious...Atleast Bush is still around and won't buckle to this crap: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137719,00.html
GG Posted November 6, 2004 Posted November 6, 2004 Whatever the point I was trying to make..It's moot now....stevestojan is about to get serious...Atleast Bush is still around and won't buckle to this crap: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137719,00.html 104407[/snapback] Annan, "If the US holds off, it can turn Fallujah into another Darfur." If the UN was really concerned about elections in January 2005, why did they cut and run in August 2003?
Recommended Posts