Willis990 Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 http://www.profootballcentral.com/2009/04/...-trading-block/
MrLocke Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Proof in scouting you have to go by a how a player plays the game and not the combine.
Willis990 Posted May 1, 2009 Author Posted May 1, 2009 Proof in scouting you have to go by a how a player plays the game and not the combine. Agreed
PromoTheRobot Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Why is it when the Pats dump big salary players they are hailed geniuses? If it were the Bills all we'd hear is how cheap Ralph is. PTR
FluffHead Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Why is it when the Pats dump big salary players they are hailed geniuses? If it were the Bills all we'd hear is how cheap Ralph is. PTR because they dump salaries and win super bowls. we dump salaries and suck.
The Big Cat Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Why is it when the Pats dump big salary players they are hailed geniuses? If it were the Bills all we'd hear is how cheap Ralph is. PTR Or we'd hear about what poor financial planning the investment was in the first place and how it's all because our scouts suck, our coaches don't know their own talent, and the FO just wants to GIVE away money.
Swift Sylvan Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Why is it when the Pats dump big salary players they are hailed geniuses? If it were the Bills all we'd hear is how cheap Ralph is. PTR Because they have finished their last 8 seasons with a record higher than 7-9.
PromoTheRobot Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Because they have finished their last 8 seasons with a record higher than 7-9. Yes but they regularly let go off players who want new deals. Meanwhle the Bills are expected to make every whiney beyotch the highest paid player in the NFL. PTR
Swift Sylvan Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Yes but they regularly let go off players who want new deals. Meanwhle the Bills are expected to make every whiney beyotch the highest paid player in the NFL. PTR It could be similar to how offensive lineman make it to the pro-bowl. Even if they have a bad season they still are hailed as a pro-bowl player. Sounds like a player from last year, but I forget his name... If we make that analogy to coaches and team personal decisions. The Patsy's just get the benefit of the doubt. We just have to prove people wrong.
silvermike Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 The Patriots deserve some benefit of the doubt, but I think their magical run is beginning to pass over the horizon. For a team that was once built through the draft, their picks have been slacking lately. Granted, it's harder to break onto a good team's roster than ours, but still. http://drafthistory.com/teams/patriots.html Other than Jerod Mayo, their last clear hit was Logan Mankins. Brandon Merriweather is a starter, and his stat line is run-of-the-mill for a starting safety. Maroney got beat out by Sammy Morris. Chad Jackson got cut. Wheatly is a backup. David Thomas and Garrett Mills are marginal players, etc.
The Big Cat Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 The Patriots deserve some benefit of the doubt, but I think their magical run is beginning to pass over the horizon. For a team that was once built through the draft, their picks have been slacking lately. Granted, it's harder to break onto a good team's roster than ours, but still. http://drafthistory.com/teams/patriots.html Other than Jerod Mayo, their last clear hit was Logan Mankins. Brandon Merriweather is a starter, and his stat line is run-of-the-mill for a starting safety. Maroney got beat out by Sammy Morris. Chad Jackson got cut. Wheatly is a backup. David Thomas and Garrett Mills are marginal players, etc. I guess the question is: How "marginal" would those player be in Buffalo?
silvermike Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 I guess the question is: How "marginal" would those player be in Buffalo? Well, Garrett Mills was marginal enough to be put on the practice squad, claimed by the Vikings, and put together seven receptions in three years. So I'm guessing he wouldn't stand out on the Bills either. But I mean, I'm not looking for the Pats to start going 7-9 or anything in the near future, but they're going to live and die by the same corps they have all the way through: Brady, Wilfork, Seymour, and the line. As they start aging and acquiring more injuries, it's not clear the replacements have arrived, and the Pats may fall back into the pack with 9-12 win seasons.
Steely Dan Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Why is it when the Pats dump big salary players they are hailed geniuses? If it were the Bills all we'd hear is how cheap Ralph is. PTR Or we'd hear about what poor financial planning the investment was in the first place and how it's all because our scouts suck, our coaches don't know their own talent, and the FO just wants to GIVE away money. Yeah, if Peters had come out and sucked next year, a distinct possibility, then a lot of people would B word about that. Yes but they regularly let go off players who want new deals. Meanwhle the Bills are expected to make every whiney beyotch the highest paid player in the NFL. PTR Some of the people here would run the FO like Sybil.
ans4e64 Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 That is not a report. That is a guy starting a rumor based on the evidence that 1.) The Patriots just traded for Alex Smith, and 2.) Watson will become a free agent.
Steely Dan Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 The Patriots deserve some benefit of the doubt, but I think their magical run is beginning to pass over the horizon. For a team that was once built through the draft, their picks have been slacking lately. Granted, it's harder to break onto a good team's roster than ours, but still. http://drafthistory.com/teams/patriots.html Other than Jerod Mayo, their last clear hit was Logan Mankins. Brandon Merriweather is a starter, and his stat line is run-of-the-mill for a starting safety. Maroney got beat out by Sammy Morris. Chad Jackson got cut. Wheatly is a backup. David Thomas and Garrett Mills are marginal players, etc. Thanks. Do you have to pay to join that site?
Mickey Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Why is it when the Pats dump big salary players they are hailed geniuses? If it were the Bills all we'd hear is how cheap Ralph is. PTR As good as Watson is, he isn't a pro bowler and NE has plenty of top talent elsewhere in their roster who deserve a larger piece of their salary cap than does Watson. On the other hand, our roster is bereft of top talent and we just let one of the few legit top 5 in the league guys we have go to philly. That seems to explain rather obviously why we are perpetually mediocre and a prime candidate to replace the Lions as the biggest joke in the league. We have some good WR's, a promising QB and good special teams though our PK is a bit shaky at times. That is about all we have to hang our hats on.
Mickey Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 It could be similar to how offensive lineman make it to the pro-bowl. Even if they have a bad season they still are hailed as a pro-bowl player. Sounds like a player from last year, but I forget his name... If we make that analogy to coaches and team personal decisions. The Patsy's just get the benefit of the doubt. We just have to prove people wrong. Jeeezus, you do realize it was the Bills that were 0-6 in the division last year and not the Patriots? Don't you? It isn't the benefit of the doubt at work here, it is actual, honest to goodness, on the field results. Facts, not conjecture. People don't unfairly think we sucked last year, we really and truly did. And we "fixed" it by dumping our one pro bowler. And he wasn't just "hailed" as a pro bowler, he actually was a pro bolwer, twice.
Mickey Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Yes but they regularly let go off players who want new deals. Meanwhle the Bills are expected to make every whiney beyotch the highest paid player in the NFL. PTR Not every whiney beyotch, just the ones who make the pro bowl twice. And really, the point isn't what they pay this or that player, the point is winning and the Bills don't do that. When you regularly lose and spend the post season on the golf course, your personnel decsions, especially when it involves dumping a two time pro bowler in his prime, are legitimately going be called into question. The Patriots let go of players but not guys in their prime, for them they break the bank. The guys they let go are the guys on the backsides of their careers like Lawyer Milloy. The Bills on the other hand, break the bank for aging, fading vets, like Schobel. The results are pretty obvious on the field.
Thoner7 Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Yes but they regularly let go off players who want new deals. Meanwhle the Bills are expected to make every whiney beyotch the highest paid player in the NFL. PTR The Patriots fill their holes before creating more. The Pats would have traded Peters, but they would have his replacement on the roster before the trade. They resign players they need, let walk players they dont. The Bills routinely let players who they need desperately, leave.
Lurker Posted May 1, 2009 Posted May 1, 2009 Why is it when the Pats dump big salary players they are hailed geniuses? If it were the Bills all we'd hear is how cheap Ralph is. PTR Winning will do that for you...everybody's a front runner at heart.
Recommended Posts