Leonidas Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 ...will be back I take it?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glass To The Arson Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 i hope so! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeJuiceSimpson Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 ...will be back I take it?? We could trade him for a player but it's not likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 26, 2009 Author Share Posted April 26, 2009 Sweet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 ...will be back I take it?? why not keep a guy who can change a game in 10 seconds??? its not like we have a ton of those guys. Leodis,Mcgee and occasionally Evans are our only other gamebreaker playmakers now that Greer is gone.Hopefully Maybin and Jarius will change that a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 If Roscoe never sees the field except on punt returns it means we are a better offense. To trade him for a 5th (or worse) round pick would be a waste in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 The trade rumors may have been the FO and coaches trying to light a fire under his butt. Great PR but there needs to be more progress at WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 Lets just hope they cut the dead-weight that IS Chris Kelsay. On the plus side, with the pick of Byrd (and Harris to some degree, although I clearly think the Bills see him as a SLB), you can kiss Ko "Millionare" Simpson goodbye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 i like that we get to keep parrish. i wouldnt mind keeping kelsay for run situations too. as someone mentioned with Ko, there is other, less productive, dread weight to cut instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 i like that we get to keep parrish. i wouldnt mind keeping kelsay for run situations too. as someone mentioned with Ko, there is other, less productive, dread weight to cut instead. Ko, Parrish and a mid-round pick next year for Henderson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 Nobody wants Ko Simpson-Bills included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 The trade rumors may have been the FO and coaches trying to light a fire under his butt. Great PR but there needs to be more progress at WR. He'll never be a valuable WR--this he has proven. For a guy who is a great punt returner, he doesn't do much after the catch. Keep him as a returner if possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillnutinHouston Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 Nobody wants Ko Simpson-Bills included. Um...maybe the cops do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cody Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 A few weeks ago I suggested that Parrish could have a higher trade value after the draft. A team the wanted a returner, but didn't get one, could be willing to trade a decent 2010 pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. T Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 He'll never be a valuable WR--this he has proven. For a guy who is a great punt returner, he doesn't do much after the catch. Keep him as a returner if possible. The Bears have a certain "wr" who is only good at returning kicks. They don't seem to have problem keeping him around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Philster Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 The Bears have a certain "wr" who is only good at returning kicks. They don't seem to have problem keeping him around. How much of a glut do they have at WR, though? We have Evans-TO-Reed-Parrish-Johnson-Hardy-Jenkins who all have something to bring to the team. With that FS we drafted in the 2nd, he could take over at PR...make Roscoe expendable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cody Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 If Parrish really wants to stay in Buffalo, he'd text Jauron: DJ I luv U I want to play CB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I am glad we still have Roscoe! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dog14787 Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 If Roscoe never sees the field except on punt returns it means we are a better offense. To trade him for a 5th (or worse) round pick would be a waste in my opinion. especially for another CB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog69 Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I am hopeful that Parrish stays on the Bills. The problem for him and the Bills is that they generally only keep 6 WRs. Owens Evans Reed Hardy Steve Johnson I think those 5 guys are locks. The last spot is usually kept for a special teams gunner like Justin Jenkins. A bigger wideout who gets downfield and makes tackles on ST. Parrish obviously is not that guy. My hope is that Johnson can fill that role or one of the extra DBs or LBs so that we can keep a premier Returner who will probably only see VERY limited action at WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts