Sisyphean Bills Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 But wasn't that BEFORE we took Levitre? Jauron's comments? Yeah. I read them during the first round. I was trying to figure out if Hangartner had photos or something.
Tcali Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 My guess we gave up a #4 to move up? The Bills are working on the lines early for a change. A good sign. maybe it has finally sunk in.........build from the inside out...I really like what we have done today.
bisonbrigade Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 Awesome baby. But where does he play? Tackle, Guard, what about Butler, Wood ,Hagernatre Butler is a tackle, but was moved to guard because Peters and Walker are at Tackle. Maybe the plan is to shift Butler back to Tackle.
ans4e64 Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 Butler is a tackle, but was moved to guard because Peters and Walker are at Tackle. Maybe the plan is to shift Butler back to Tackle. Butler was moved to guard because my grandmother could run around the edge on him.
Ever Since '86 Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 How funny is it that Parcells has now drafted 2 dbs and a gadget player and the Bills have taken 3 linemen and a db? Weird. haha good point
nucci Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 Yeah, but he'll play corner on the Bills. We're going to field a new D schema - 11 Corners Just never get tired of the wonderful CB jokes. Keep them coming.
nucci Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 I'm confused. Unless he's going to play tackle shouldn't the interior line be fine with Wood, Hangartner and Butler. Is this a vote of non-confidence for Butler? Could Butler move to Tackle where he played in University I believe. Young depth.
Bill Murray Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 Young depth. And versatility...Between Levitre and Wood, we just got an extra player (first day player for that matter) at every OL position....
BuffaloBill Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 Levitra (yeah, I know) has played Guard and BOTH tackle positions in college. He's going to be an important guy even if he doesn't crack the starting lineup. One of the reasons why the Bills like Chambers - he can play several positions on the line. My guess is that this is a depth and push the starting players pick. Bills appear to be set at C and G. Time will tell how the Tackle situation plays out. I think Bell may be the key to all of this. I think the Bills do not give up Peters unless they are very high on te guy.
timba Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 Butler was moved to guard because my grandmother could run around the edge on him. nice
ColdBlueNorth Posted April 26, 2009 Posted April 26, 2009 no way, he projects as a guard. also, we gave them a 3rd and 4th this year. when do we get our OLB and a TE. I just think they don't view TE as a need at all I have been preaching that TE is not the teams most pressing need. Having a big play-making TE is a luxury on a team that has Owens and Evans on opposite sides of the field. They will rely on Fine and Schouman and that practice squad guy that they let go and picked up again with the unfortunate last name "Stupid" or something like that. To contend at all this team needed to pressure the passer and get more physical on the O-Line and that is what they went after (with the obligatory CB pick sandwiched in there). Fine has good hands and blocks well and can get the short yardage midfield dump passes. Then they picked up a short-yardage running back in Rhodes for those goal line situations. If the line can gel quickly and Edwards can stay healthy - who knows.
Recommended Posts