SKOOBY Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 Best offensive weapon in the draft & he would give us a unstoppable 4 set.
Sanjosebillsfan Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 The Bills needs should be DE, OT and TE. A DE should be taken at the 11th spot then OT at 28.
atlbillsfan1975 Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 This is what Detroit did for years. How did that work out for them Skooby?
SKOOBY Posted April 25, 2009 Author Posted April 25, 2009 This is what Detroit did for years. How did that work out for them Skooby? More fun to watch then the crap we've been served for 5 years, I'm sick of soup.
Lurker Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 More fun to watch then the crap we've been served for 5 years, I'm sick of soup. Huh? I'm sick of your pointless posts. Small world...
Clarence H. Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 Best offensive weapon in the draft & he would give us a unstoppable 4 set. Yes ... Ok ... and if he is not available do you teke P. Harvin at 28 if he is there?
SKOOBY Posted April 25, 2009 Author Posted April 25, 2009 I'm sick As I am a small minded neophytes, even smaller world.
davefan66 Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 If Curry is gone and Crabtree is available, of course the Bills would take him. I for one, would applaud it. Best player available baby!
Brandon Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 I wouldn't have any argument with it. Sure, they signed TO, but how long is that going to last? One year...and then we're right back where we started. Maybe James Hardy and his knee turn into a quality WR, maybe Steve Johnson defies the odds as a 7th rounder...or maybe not. If the Bills think Crabtree is an elite talent and if the injury situation checks out, they'd be stupid to pass on him given their struggles of the last decade in the passing game. Not that it matters. I'd be stunned if Crabtree makes it out of the top 10.
Ghost of Rob Johnson Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 The Bills needs should be DE, OT and TE. A DE should be taken at the 11th spot then OT at 28. I agree with Skooby, everyone always states that the best teams never select for need, but instead the best available players. If this were to be the case however, Roscoe deal definately needs to go through.
SouthGeorgiaBillsFan Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 Best offensive weapon in the draft & he would give us a unstoppable 4 set. I'm pretty sure sacks will still stop it. Just an absurd thought. Actually absurd isn't a strong enough word to describe it.
SKOOBY Posted April 25, 2009 Author Posted April 25, 2009 I'm pretty sure sacks will still stop it. Just an absurd thought. Actually absurd isn't a strong enough word to describe it. Undefendable.
High Mark Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 If we are going to add a WR, why not Boldin? Id rather trade 11 for him than draft Crabtree at 11, but the Cards would be happy with 42. Either way, draft lineman instead.
SouthGeorgiaBillsFan Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 Undefendable. We watched the undefeated Patriots get derailed by sacks and you want to argue the point that a receiver like Crabtree, who lacks both the size to be a great threat over the middle and the speed to be a deep threat, who will pretty much be mediocre in every way, is going to make us more dynamic than that Pats team? Not only that, but the Pats had the best O line in football. We currently have the worst. Skooby you really are dumb.
Lurker Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 As I am a small minded neophytes, even smaller world. Vroom, vroom...
Bill Murray Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 No we don't. Move along, nothing to see here...
Brandon Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 If we are going to add a WR, why not Boldin? Id rather trade 11 for him than draft Crabtree at 11, but the Cards would be happy with 42. Either way, draft lineman instead. The financial cost is the barrier with Boldin. The 11th pick is probably going to sign for five or six years in the low/mid $20M range. Boldin? Its going to take an awful lot more than that to make him happy.
San-O Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 Best offensive weapon in the draft & he would give us a unstoppable 4 set. SKOOBY. This isn't "Coffee Talk", and you're not Linda Richman!
RayFinkle Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 More fun to watch then the crap we've been served for 5 years, I'm sick of soup. The Lions have been fun to watch? I guess I haven't been watching enough football.
Brandon Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 The Lions have been fun to watch? I guess I haven't been watching enough football. The interesting thing about the Lions is that they've tried both approaches to no avail. Everyone rags them for selecting WRs high, but they tried going the OL route early in the decade. They even tossed in a few high round DL and LBs for good measure. That didn't work, either. The moral of this story? Just because you draft an OL in round one doesn't automatically make them any good. The Bills need to be careful that they don't fall into that particular trap. If they don't have an OL or defensive front seven player rated very highly when they're up at 11, they need to trust their board instead of attempting to satisfy the fans.
Recommended Posts