Ramius Posted April 20, 2009 Posted April 20, 2009 Ramius, I went over your numbers and my numbers and generated some more numbers (don't ask why). I have the results and will post them some time soon. I don't want to corrupt this thread. Thanks buddy. That's fine. Back on topic, i think you can't simply define specific positions as "less likely to bust" simply because they are position X. You need to look at the causality. Take OGs for instance. Most of them aren't drafted until the late 20's. The best 4-6 teams in the league are picking in the late 20's. So, an OG drafted then is either going to 1. sit the bench for a bit and not be expected to contribute a ton right away, and 2. step into a much better situation with better players around them.
Recommended Posts