nuklz2594 Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 I am thinking with a Tequila hangover-that the signing of Rhodes could be the end of Lynch. If Rhodes and Jackson perform well, we could trade Lynch. Be gentle.
JoeF Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 I was actually thinking the same thing this week. I see another RB with one of those 9 picks as well-- maybe one of the first 4. RB is a low shelf life position. Most crap out after 5-6 years and the way Lynch runs I can see him on that scale.....so both from a behavior and a practical standpoint....hmmmmmmm Get your salt shaker and lime ready Buffalo
nuklz2594 Posted April 18, 2009 Author Posted April 18, 2009 I really think that Lynch will be traded. If he had not gotten into trouble we may have had a chance at going 3-0. Rhodes and Jackson will be highly motivated for produce this season. The days of using only a single rb are done. Would not be surprised if we stop drafting rb's in the first for good.
BillnutinHouston Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 I really think that Lynch will be traded. If he had not gotten into trouble we may have had a chance at going 3-0. Rhodes and Jackson will be highly motivated for produce this season. The days of using only a single rb are done. Would not be surprised if we stop drafting rb's in the first for good. Wonder what we could get for Lynch. That on top of the other offseason moves would make for quite a wild ride.
SKOOBY Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 I think that Lynch will be fresh come game 4, new legs to compliment our offense.
nuklz2594 Posted April 18, 2009 Author Posted April 18, 2009 I don't think we would get a 1st round pick for him because of his baggage, but crazier things have happened.
Cheeseburger_in_paradise Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 Come on folks. Overall, Lynch hasn't been that bad. At times he's been the only bright spot. So what if he ran somebody over. That's what running backs do.
Buffalo_Stampede Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 They wont trade Lynch unless something else happens, but by giving Rhodes a 2 year deal, they protect themselves.
Leonidas Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 Jesus people. Rhodes is a 30 year old re-tread. He is there to spell Jackson in case Omon isn't ready weeks 1-3 next year. This doesn't/shouldn't mean anything for Lynch. Lynch should stay put. He's 22. With Jackson being 28 and Rhodes being 30, neither is the future at RB for Buffalo. Lynch is. And thanks to his off the field issues, he won't be banging down the door of the FO for MJD-type $$ just yet, so we won't have to trade him away a la Jason Peters.
atlbillsfan1975 Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 So you like being excited in the offseason, as opposed to the regular season? Bacause trading Lynch would only serve that purpose.
nuklz2594 Posted April 18, 2009 Author Posted April 18, 2009 yes Lynch will be in shape, but not football shape. History shows that guys who hold out, show up in shape, but need a few games to under their belts before they can shoulder the load, or get hurt.
Numark Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 who would want to get over lynch. I understand getting rid of people like peters. But lynch. come on
BuffaloRebound Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 I think this means Parrish is gone. This frees up Jackson to split return duties with McKelvin and be the 3rd down back.
lets_go_bills Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 Jesus people. Rhodes is a 30 year old re-tread. He is there to spell Jackson in case Omon isn't ready weeks 1-3 next year. This doesn't/shouldn't mean anything for Lynch. Lynch should stay put. He's 22. With Jackson being 28 and Rhodes being 30, neither is the future at RB for Buffalo. Lynch is. And thanks to his off the field issues, he won't be banging down the door of the FO for MJD-type $$ just yet, so we won't have to trade him away a la Jason Peters. Bingo. Agree with everything you said. Finally, a smart post in this dumb thread. Lynch isn't going anywhere, he is the franchise RB and is the long term future of the Bills rushing attack.
Flbillsfan#1 Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 yes Lynch will be in shape, but not football shape. History shows that guys who hold out, show up in shape, but need a few games to under their belts before they can shoulder the load, or get hurt. I'm pretty sure suspended players are alowed to attend Training Camp & play in the Preseason. RB's also do not need the time to adjust to others as O-Linemen do, Lynch should be fine.
rackemrack Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 I think this means Parrish is gone. This frees up Jackson to split return duties with McKelvin and be the 3rd down back. possibly, i was thinking more along the lines of preparing for jackson's exit or in case he holds out for a decent contract...
VOR Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 I'm pretty sure suspended players are alowed to attend Training Camp & play in the Preseason. RB's also do not need the time to adjust to others as O-Linemen do, Lynch should be fine. Yep. Lynch can participate in everything except for the games for which he is suspended.
Leonidas Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 possibly, i was thinking more along the lines of preparing for jackson's exit or in case he holds out for a decent contract... Jackson won't hold out. He's an RFA. My understand is that he gets seriously dicked over if he holds out. Once the rookie contracts are settled I would like to see him get a bonus, but a long-term deal? Seeing that we could turn our #2RB into a first rounder next year? (Still waiting on confirmation of that by TG, but he's been a bit busy lately) I wouldn't sign him to a long term contract, not if that's the case. Someone said it yesterday, that people on this board treat Jackson like he's the second coming of Walter Payton and it's true.
VOR Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 Jackson won't hold out. He's an RFA. He's not even a RFA. He's an EFA, which means he has even less leverage than a RFA, which has little to begin with.
nuklz2594 Posted April 19, 2009 Author Posted April 19, 2009 y'all need to lighten up on the venom being spewed about. I only said it was a thought. With a salary cap and all, one has to watch every dollar. Not to be a buzz kill, but Yahoo rated Buffalo as the 5th toughest place to live in the USA. Hope things make a turn for the better.
Recommended Posts