Peter Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 ESPN article on trade Wouldn't that be a kick in the butt if the Eagles picked Pettigrew or someone else we wanted because we did not insist on their 21st pick rather than their 28th?!?
Peter Posted April 17, 2009 Author Posted April 17, 2009 That's why we'll pick him at 11 Makes sense. Limit your options by agreeing to a pick 7 spots later.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 One very interesting part of next week's draft will be to see what names come off the board between picks #21 and #28.
BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 It will only be fitting for the Eagles to completely screw us over by taking Pettigrew at #21. HOWEVER...they probably wont, from scanning over a few Eagles boards, TE seems to only be a modest need. They desperately want to land a young (non-injury prone) RB to spell Westbrook and eventually replace him. Westbrook will be 30 when the season begins and the Eagles seem to be getting nervous.
papazoid Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 NO.......because Pettigrew will be long gone, going at #11....lol besides, i think they go RB
WellDressed Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 It will only be fitting for the Eagles to completely screw us over by taking Pettigrew at #21. HOWEVER...they probably wont, from scanning over a few Eagles boards, TE seems to only be a modest need. They desperately want to land a young (non-injury prone) RB to spell Westbrook and eventually replace him. Westbrook will be 30 when the season begins and the Eagles seem to be getting nervous. andy reid is a trench-man type draft guy. He does what we should have done...... He don't go after skill position picks early much then. If those bastards take Pettigrew with 21.....I will not be quite that very happy in it.
Max997 Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 i was listening to Sal Pal on the radio here in Philly on the way home and he said the Eagles are still in the hunt for Boldin even with the trade for Peters but if they keep the 21st pick expect them to go with Pettigrew TE or Moreno RB
WellDressed Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 i was listening to Sal Pal on the radio here in Philly on the way home and he said the Eagles are still in the hunt for Boldin even with the trade for Peters but if they keep the 21st pick expect them to go with Pettigrew TE or Moreno RB As I posted a bit early in our day, I was splanin the dough boy don't go skill early............wesssbrook was a fif I think. hic, a fif.
Alphadawg7 Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 No, they take Hakeem Nicks or they trade their first and third to AZ for Boldin... Personally I think they get Boldin, but if they dont, I just dont see them passing on Nicks...
Big Turk Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 ESPN article on trade Wouldn't that be a kick in the butt if the Eagles picked Pettigrew or someone else we wanted because we did not insist on their 21st pick rather than their 28th?!? its ludicrous that Buffalo didn't insist on the 21st pick rather than the 28th. Philly would have buckled before the draft and given in....what, they are gonna make him the highest paid player in the NFL at LT but they won't give up a higher 1st round pick? Makes no sense, which is why they almost certainly would have broken down and given the Bills the 21st pick if they would have just been a little more patient
Max997 Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 As I posted a bit early in our day, I was splanin the dough boy don't go skill early............wesssbrook was a fif I think. hic, a fif. I dont know what language that is but I think you said Westbrook was a 5th which is not correct, he was a 3rd...they also took DeSean Jackson in the second last year and Reggie Brown in the second or third a few years ago i also think the Eagles are going all out this year and are going to get Boldin as well...they have the picks and the money and McNabb only has a few years left so why not Peters and Boldin for two 1st's, a 3rd, a 4th and a conditional 6th...sounds too good to be true for Eagles fans
Numark Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 I like how you all act like the bills Front Office didn't try their absolute hardest for the 21st overall pick. I am sure they got the best they could. They aren't that incapable.
WellDressed Posted April 21, 2009 Posted April 21, 2009 I dont know what language that is but I think you said Westbrook was a 5th which is not correct, he was a 3rd...they also took DeSean Jackson in the second last year and Reggie Brown in the second or third a few years ago i also think the Eagles are going all out this year and are going to get Boldin as well...they have the picks and the money and McNabb only has a few years left so why not Peters and Boldin for two 1st's, a 3rd, a 4th and a conditional 6th...sounds too good to be true for Eagles fans Keep cheerin for the flyers too.....
Recommended Posts