Tipster19 Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 The Bills did what was best for the organization. This will send a clear message to the rest of the players that we will not be blackmailed when it comes to contracts. I don't like the that we lost Peters but I also don't like when players sign a valid contract and then become disruptive until they get a new one. Here's a question I'd be curious about. When Peters was signed to his current contract, if he underperformed, do you think that he would have still sat out? Look on the bright side. We got a 1st rder, 4th rder, and a future late rder all for an UDFA. That's a heck of a lot more appreciation than this rotten economy has been. Sold! TO gets badmouthed but at least the guy is wanting to be productive. Peters on the otherhand is all about himself. Good riddance.
Recommended Posts