Jump to content

Peters trade in context


Recommended Posts

The trade value chart is obsolete at this point. It doesn't take into account the huge discrepancy in compensation between high first round picks and lower first round picks. It is an imperfect tool.

 

That being said, it is the starting point for trade discussions involving draft picks. Here's how the Peters trade breaks down based on the (admittedly obsolete) chart:

 

Philly's 1st rounder, 28th overall pick equals 660 pts.

Philly's 4th rounder, 121st overall pick equals 52 pts.

Philly's late rounder in 2010, projected as the best 7th rounder, 193rd overall equals 14 pts.

 

It appears that for Jason Peters we got the equivalent of 726 points which is equivalent in value to somewhere between the 24th and 25 pick in the draft.

 

It is arguable that we would have been better off receiving Philly's other first round pick, #21 than the picks that we received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should help, here's the revised chart that as many as 18 teams used last year:

 

1 2,000

2 1,900

3 1,825

4 1,750

5 1,675

6 1,635

7 1,570

8 1,505

9 1,440

10 1,375

11 1,320

12 1,275

13 1,230

14 1,185

15 1,140

16 1,110

17 1,070

18 1,040

19 1,010

20  980

21  945

22  920

23  895

24  870

25  845

26  820

27  795

28  770

29  745

30  720

31  695

32  670

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trade value chart is obsolete at this point. It doesn't take into account the huge discrepancy in compensation between high first round picks and lower first round picks. It is an imperfect tool.

 

That being said, it is the starting point for trade discussions involving draft picks. Here's how the Peters trade breaks down based on the (admittedly obsolete) chart:

 

Philly's 1st rounder, 28th overall pick equals 660 pts.

Philly's 4th rounder, 121st overall pick equals 52 pts.

Philly's late rounder in 2010, projected as the best 7th rounder, 193rd overall equals 14 pts.

It appears that for Jason Peters we got the equivalent of 726 points which is equivalent in value to somewhere between the 24th and 25 pick in the draft.

Why do you say "at best a 7th rounder?" That suggests you think Peters will be a total bust in Philly. I think conditional means 7th is the worst it will be, depending on what range the Bills negotaited.

 

PTR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you say "at best a 7th rounder?" That suggests you think Peters will be a total bust in Philly. I think conditional means 7th is the worst it will be, depending on what range the Bills negotaited.

 

PTR

Easy Promo. I'm just putting stuff out there. The discussion will develop. If we substitute the best 7th rounder with the best fourth rounder (112 pts) we now have a total of 824 pts which is equal to between the 20th and 21st picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should help, here's the revised chart that as many as 18 teams used last year:

 

1 2,000

2 1,900

3 1,825

4 1,750

5 1,675

6 1,635

7 1,570

8 1,505

9 1,440

10 1,375

11 1,320

12 1,275

13 1,230

14 1,185

15 1,140

16 1,110

17 1,070

18 1,040

19 1,010

20  980

21  945

22  920

23  895

24  870

25  845

26  820

27  795

28  770

29  745

30  720

31  695

32  670

Thank you Bandit. Do the values in the other rounds change too? If so I need more info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Bandit. Do the values in the other rounds change too? If so I need more info.

 

Sure do...here's the whole bloody thing:

 

1 2,000

2 1,900

3 1,825

4 1,750

5 1,675

6 1,635

7 1,570

8 1,505

9 1,440

10 1,375

11 1,320

12 1,275

13 1,230

14 1,185

15 1,140

16 1,110

17 1,070

18 1,040

19 1,010

20  980

21  945

22  920

23  895

24  870

25  845

26  820

27  795

28  770

29  745

30  720

31  695

32  670

33 570

34 560

35 550

36 540

37 530

38 520

39 510

40 500

41 490

42 480

43 470

44 460

45 450

46 440

47 430

48 420

49 410

50 400

51 390

52 380

53 370

54 360

55 350

56 340

57 330

58 320

59 310

60 300

61 292

62 284

63 276

64 270

65 265

66 260

67 255

68 250

69 245

70 240

71 235

72 230

73 225

74 220

75 215

76 210

77 205

78 200

79 195

80 190

81 185

82 180

83 175

84 170

85 165

86 160

87 155

88 150

89 145

90 140

91 136

92 132

93 128

94 124

95 120

96 116

97 112

98 108

99 104

100 100

101 96

102 92

103 88

104 86

105 84

106 82

107 80

108 78

109 76

110 74

111 72

112 70

113 68

114 66

115 64

116 62

117 60

118 58

119 56

120 54

121 52

122 50

123 49

124 48

125 47

126 46

127 45

128 44

129 43

130 42

131 41

132 40

133 40

134 39

135 39

136 38

137 38

138 37

139 37

140 36

141 36

142 35

143 35

144 34

145 34

146 33

147 33

148 32

149 32

150 31

151 31

152 31

153 30

154 30

155 29

156 29

157 29

158 28

159 28

160 27

161 27

162 27

163 26

164 26

165 25

166 25

167 25

168 24

169 24

170 23

171 23

172 23

173 22

174 22

175 21

176 21

177 21

178 20

179 20

180 19

181 19

182 19

183 18

184 18

185 17

186 17

187 17

188 16

189 16

190 15

191 15

192 15

193 14

194 14

195 13

196 13

197 13

198 12

199 12

200 11

201 11

202 11

203 10

204 10

205 9

206 9

207 9

208 8

209 8

210 7

211 7

212 7

213 6

214 6

215 5

216 5

217 5

218 4

219 4

220 3

221 3

222 3

223 2

224 2

 

Since the 23 compensatory picks cannot be traded they have no value, so only the pick number will change around them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone interested the new chart that teams apparently are using as a starting point:

 

http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/15/...ft-trade-chart/

 

Using this chart the Bills received #28=770 pts, #121=52 pts, and anywhere from #97 (best 4th round pick)=112 pts to #193 (best 7th round pick)=14 pts.

 

That gives us a total of best case 934 pts=between the #21-22 pick.

 

A total worst case of 836 pts= between the #25-26 pick.

 

Basically according to either chart, the Bills received something approaching the equivalent of the 21st pick in the draft for Peters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...