BEAST MODE BABY! Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 This is the first day in my 33 years of life I can honestly say I am friggin embarassed to be a Bills fan! You weren't embarrassed after they kept Jauron? You must be one of those people who kept their season tickets.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 Seemed like this was an inevitability...oh well, now they move on. Stoking things - could the Bills be thinking about packaging and moving up? Well Cinci, that would mean (among other things) that they would potentially lose the opportunity to fill two needs and only fill one need instead. And moving up would reduce the amount of money they would "save" by trading Peters. We just created another need that we have to fill. So at #11 we take a tackle? And at #28 we take Pettigrew? So we won't draft a pass rusher till #42? Like I said earlier, I'm disappointed in the compensation.
pBills Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 Great deal. Having two first round picks and a 4th, plus a conditional next year. Glad they got rid of the problem child. Only way that could have been better is if they got the 1st and the Philly TE.
BillsFanNC Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 Good riddance. I'd like to know the terms of that conditional pick next year.
Coach Tuesday Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 Only way that could have been better is if they got the 1st and the Philly TE. Brad Celek? Yeah that would've sweetened the pot for sure.
bills_fan Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 Please. THIS is the day you are humiliated? Not the countless on the field mishaps or flops? Nope, never humiliated. My team played and lost, it happens. Its football. You weren't embarrassed after they kept Jauron? You must be one of those people who kept their season tickets. Nope, not at all. My opinion on Jauron would never have made me embarassed to be a fan of this team like today did. Believe me, I have never made a statement like that before and don't take it lightly. This trade proves that there is absolutely no commitment to winning from that organization.
Peter Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 Please. THIS is the day you are humiliated? Not the countless on the field mishaps or flops? They would not be the Buffalo Bills if they did not repeatedly break my heart. Usually, they do it during the season. This time they let the Eagles fleece us. At a minimum, it should have been the 21st pick in the draft and a third -- at a minimum. Instead, we gave the Eagles a left tackle that they never would have been able to get with the 21st or the 28th pick in the draft. At best (for the Eagles), they would have had to package both their 21st and 28th pick in the draft to get in the top of the draft to have a chance at one of the top three left tackles in the draft -- all of which are unproven commodities. Horrible deal by the Bills.
atlbillsfan1975 Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 Tim any idea what the conditional pick next year hinges on? I wanted a first and a third this year too. But if next years pick turns out to be a third rounder, then would not be a bad deal.
VOR Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 Good riddance. I'd like to know the terms of that conditional pick next year. Me too. If it could be as high as a 1st rounder based on post-season accolades, it would make this a much better trade.
Kelly the Dog Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 Me too. If it could be as high as a 1st rounder based on post-season accolades, it would make this a much better trade. Glazer said late round pick. I would assume it's a 6th or 7th that could move up a notch.
BeastMode54 Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 28th pick is like a second rounder. FOR A PRO-BOWL LEFT TACKLE?!! Agreed, we should have gotten their first pick in the first round and a 3rd. I'm SO PISSED RIGHT NOW!
billsfreak Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 Would have liked to see more compensation, but glad it is over and glad he is gone. He was never going to be happy in Buffalo, and give him a year or two and he won't be happy in Philly either.
thebandit27 Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 At least he's gone. He did not want to play in Buffalo. It will be interesting to see what kind of contract the Eagles give him. But the front office just got burned big time by the Eagles. I'm sooooooooooo sick of seeing this BS. He liked Buffalo, it was BEING THE 21ST HIGHEST PAID LT IN FOOTBALL (and the 29th highest paid overall) THAT HE DIDN'T LIKE.
BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 They would not be the Buffalo Bills if they did not repeatedly break my heart. Usually, they do it during the season. This time they let the Eagles fleece us. At a minimum, it should have been the 21st pick in the draft and a third -- at a minimum. Instead, we gave the Eagles a left tackle that they never would have been able to get with the 21st or the 28th pick in the draft. At best (for the Eagles), they would have had to package both their 21st and 28th pick in the draft to get in the top of the draft to have a chance at one of the top three left tackles in the draft -- all of which are unproven commodities. Horrible deal by the Bills. Do you think the Bills had any other options? What other NFL team needs a LT, has that much cap space and that many picks to work with? Its not like the Bills could have said "Well, The Raiders are willing to give us so and so...you need to increase your offer" I honestly think Philly was the only team interested with what Peters' was selling. Do I think we could have gotten a third instead of a fourth? Maybe. Either way, its not that far off from what I expected. No way in hell Peters would have netted us two first rounders, absolutely not.
oddoublee Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 If Peters was in the draft pool, the lions most likely would have taken him first overall. Now I know we were not trading him to a top ten pick team-but the 28th pick is horrible compensation. less than likely to replace him w a probowl caliber player there-or at 11. draft is a crap shoot, and we traded a sure thing. frustrating.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 BTW, Thanks Tim. To put you on the spot a bit, what is your opinion of the compensation that's being reported? Thanks again. It's kinda funny seeing the feeding frenzy...like piranhas on a goat.
Steely Dan Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 I'll reserve judgement until I see what the conditions on the 2010 pick are. As it stands, its a bit underwhelming, but at the same time, but they didn't have much choice. Agreed, if the conditional pick can be up to a second rounder I'll say good trade.
Poeticlaw Posted April 17, 2009 Posted April 17, 2009 28th pick is like a second rounder. FOR A PRO-BOWL LEFT TACKLE?!! Considering he was undrafted we got 3 picks including a first!!! Hello!!!
Recommended Posts