Estro Posted April 14, 2009 Posted April 14, 2009 Interesting and informative article over at PFW. Just wanted to pass it on. And for those of you who still think Peters play was top notch last year, think again. I know his league leading sacks allowed have been discussed here before and many have brought up the fact that this is a very subjective stat. You may be right, but the stats don't lie, and he better get his butt in shape if he's still on this team come next year. If you were to disregard half of the sacks Peters allowed (which is overly optimistic) he would still be in the bottom half of the league for sacks allowed. http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NFLDr.../rock041409.htm
KOKBILLS Posted April 14, 2009 Posted April 14, 2009 Interesting and informative article over at PFW. Just wanted to pass it on. And for those of you who still think Peters play was top notch last year, think again. I know his league leading sacks allowed have been discussed here before and many have brought up the fact that this is a very subjective stat. You may be right, but the stats don't lie, and he better get his butt in shape if he's still on this team come next year http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NFLDr.../rock041409.htm Those who want to say Peters did not have an off year last year are just kidding themselves to be honest...Just yesterday Mike Lombardi commented that Peters had an off season due to the holdout and missed Camp...So it's pretty much public knowledge...Still, Peters is one of the better LT's in Football...He really is...And the consensus opinion right now seems to be with a full Camp, and full dedication, he'll be an elite LT once again...Maybe the best in the NFL...Of coarse if Peters stays in Buffalo and does not have a new deal we may never see Peters at his All-Pro level again. Because he WILL holdout again, he WILL miss Camp, and He WILL be less than elite if so...
Leonidas Posted April 14, 2009 Posted April 14, 2009 Thanks for that. It's pretty informative. Looking at this makes me incredulous as to why we'd pay the guy with the most amount of sacks the most amount of money. Must be in topsy-turvy world!
Recommended Posts