Beerball Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 According to coaches and 'evaluators' it is the Buffalo Bills. link Now all we need are a pash rushing DE, LB, OG, TE, DT & FB and we'll be a complete team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Destroyers! Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 According to coaches and 'evaluators' it is the Buffalo Bills. link Now all we need are a pash rushing DE, LB, OG, TE, DT & FB and we'll be a complete team. So basically what you're saying is we need a whole defensive line lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 13, 2009 Author Share Posted April 13, 2009 So basically what you're saying is we need a whole defensive line lol No, half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 I don't understand how Chicago is not on that list.....They got a Franchise QB and that is not the best offseason move ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 FA was basically a wash this year as a whole. You had a few big names like Haynesworth, Brown, Scott, and Owens switching teams. But overall, there weren't that many marquee players who made moves elsewhere. Cutler was a trade so I don't see that really counting. I think that we did help ourselves alot, but I'm not sure about the most. I would've loved to see us sign Jason Brown, but the FO stood around with their hands in their pockets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 I would've loved to see us sign Jason Brown, but the FO stood around with their hands in their pockets. It might be a mistake to assume that. The Bills were very interested in Brown, from what I heard. I think they made their play, and came up short. Same result as doing nothing perhaps, but different process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief D Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 I would still like to see Buffalo continue with one or two more FA. The draft can't fill all of the holes the Bills still need to fill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lofton80 Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 If the season started tomorrow, we could get by with our DT and DE rotations. The hole at OG is dangerous as hell with Edwards needing the time for TO and Evans to run those longer routes. Another TE is a must. FB can be had as an undrafted FA as most teams don't use one. LB is a concern is Ellison is on the field on the run downs. Now all we need are a pash rushing DE, LB, OG, TE, DT & FB and we'll be a complete team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 According to coaches and 'evaluators' it is the Buffalo Bills. link Now all we need are a pash rushing DE, LB, OG, TE, DT & FB and we'll be a complete team. Nope. All the Bills need are a bunch of offensive linemen and Terrell Owens. That's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Da Bears...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 13, 2009 Author Share Posted April 13, 2009 Nope. All the Bills need are a bunch of offensive linemen and Terrell Owens. That's it. based on your mock draft I would think so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 I don't understand how Chicago is not on that list.....They got a Franchise QB and that is not the best offseason move ??? Acquired through a trade rather than free agency. Technicality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 1) T.O definitely is a huge upgrade over Josh Reed at the #2 WR 2) Hangartner is an upgrade over Preston 3) Fitzpatrick is an upgrade ( couldn't of done worse than what JP did last year) 4) Florence fills the nickel/dime role effectively 5) Mckinnie is an upgrade over Jason Whittle Losses 1) Dockery- We've yet to fill it 2) Peters situation is unresolved??? 3) Greer - replaced by McKelvin Until we know what happens with Peters and see who replaces Dockery, all these moves will most likely be for not. If Peters stays and we fill someone with promise or a decent veteran, then the Bills have improved themselves this offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Acquired through a trade rather than free agency. Technicality. Oh yah, good point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 based on your mock draft I would think so A mock that was (where the Bills' picks were concerned) based purely on my thoughts and opinions, certainly not the result of any polls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quester74 Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 I don't understand how Chicago is not on that list.....They got a Franchise QB and that is not the best offseason move ??? I believe they said Free Agent moves.. that wouldn't include trades. Otherwise they would have to include the Matt Cassell deal, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 13, 2009 Author Share Posted April 13, 2009 A mock that was (where the Bills' picks were concerned) based purely on my thoughts and opinions, certainly not the result of any polls. I'm sorry, didn't realize this was a touchy subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 This really is hilarious though. The coaches and GMs say that the Bills improved themselves the most by signing T.O. These are the same guys, for the most part, that couldn't get their press releases out fast enough that they had no interest whatsoever in bringing T.O. to their own teams. It seems like a bit of schadenfruede to me, savoring their good fortune of "missing out" on the cancer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 A mock that was (where the Bills' picks were concerned) based purely on my thoughts and opinions, certainly not the result of any polls. But nobody can accuse me of getting in BUF's way during the mock... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts